On the closed landfill across from Valdosta State Prison on Val Tech Road,
what looks like maybe a megawatt of solar panels by the City of Valdosta.
Pictures by John S. Quarterman for Lowndes Area Knowledge Exchange, 1 September 2017
Tag Archives: Jimmy Carter
Is Porter Ranch the natural gas industry’s Three Mile Island?
Thirty-six years ago, Three Mile Island turned public opinion against nuclear power.
The worst in history, right now still spewing after three months
and Los Angeles County and the state of California have declared emergencies
at Porter Ranch,
is the “natural” gas industry’s Three Mile Island.
Nuclear, too was touted as safe, clean, and infamously “too cheap to meter”.
It turned out to be none of those things, and neither is fracked methane.
Three Mile Island alone didn’t stop the thousands of nukes President Nixon promised,
but it sure helped.
The Porter Ranch disaster has already lasted far longer, had worse direct effects, and is in the nation’s second-largest metropolitan area.
Plus TMI was the first U.S. civilian nuclear accident.
The “natural” gas industry has leaks, corrosion, fires, explosions, and now earthquakes monthly and sometimes daily.
Sure, the shadow of nuclear war hung over the nuclear power industry, but the monthly fireballs from methane explosions hangs over the natural gas industry.
The 2010 San Bruno, California explosion is back in the news because, says AP 13 January 2015:
PROSECUTORS: PG&E RESISTED RECORD-KEEPING CHANGE AFTER SAN BRUNO BLAST.
It’s time for a complete moratorium on all new natural gas projects,
like the moratorium on all new nuclear projects after Three Mile Island.
Instead, let’s get on with what we didn’t have back then:
solar and wind power already less expensive than any other sources of power,
far cleaner and safer, much faster to deploy, using no water, and requiring no eminent domain.
In
1962 President John F. Kennedy famously said: Continue reading
Jimmy Carter’s dream of a solar-powered world is coming true now
U.S. president Jimmy Carter had a dream,
thirty six years before Pope Francis spelled out why we all need to escape a dark hot nightmare,
and Jimmy Carter’s sunny dream is now coming true.
Today, in directly harnessing the power of the Sun, we’re taking the
energy that God gave us, the most renewable energy that we will ever
see, and using it to replace our dwindling supplies of fossil fuels.
Putting conservation into conservatives —John S. Quarterman
My op-ed in the VDT today. -jsq
Gov. Deal
(WABE, 14 Nov 2012)
temporarily forgot that “conservative”
includes conserving something,
like
Theodore Roosevelt and national parks,
or when
Franklin D. Roosevelt established the Okefenokee National Wildlife
Refuge which also
administers Banks Lake, when
Richard Nixon started the EPA,
and when
Jimmy Carter signed the Soil and Water Conservation Act.
If Gov. Deal wants to call conservation “liberal”, I’m happy to
be a liberal working for water for our state!
Georgia Water Coalition’s Dirty Dozen
listed the biggest boondoggle
of all as
#11: the nuclear reactors at Plant Vogtle
suck up more water from the Savannah River than all local agriculture and almost
as much as the city of Savannah.If the new Plant Vogtle nukes
are ever completed, all four will use more water than Savannah. In
2009 the legislature approved and Gov. Deal signed a law
letting Georgia
Power charge its customers in advance for building that boondoggle,
to the tune of
about $1.5 billion so far!Let’s not forget
Militarization of Police and Private Prison Profiteering: the Connection
Occupy UC Davis and the UC Davis Police have suddenly turned militarization
of police from an obscure topic to a huge story with more than 3,000
stories found by google news.
But what’s the connection between
Mic check stops a police riot at UC Davis
and
CCA charges inmates five days’ pay for one telephone minute?
The main cause of the militarization of police
is also the main cause of the huge U.S. prison population (5% of the world’s
population,
25% of the world’s prisoners: USA #1!).
That cause is the failed War on Drugs.
Norm Stanager wrote for YES! Magazine (via AlterNet) 17 November 2011,
Police Chief Who Oversaw 1999 WTO Crackdown Says Paramilitary Policing Is a Disaster
Then came day two. Early in the morning, large contingents of
demonstrators began to converge at a key downtown intersection. They sat
down and refused to budge. Their numbers grew. A labor march would soon
add additional thousands to the mix.“We have to clear the intersection,” said the field commander. “We
have to clear the intersection,” the operations commander agreed,
from his bunker in the Public Safety Building. Standing alone on the
edge of the crowd, I, the chief of police, said to myself, “We have
to clear the intersection.”Why?
Because of all the what-ifs. What if a fire breaks out in the Sheraton
across the street? What if a woman goes into labor on the seventeenth
floor of the hotel? What if a heart patient goes into cardiac arrest in
the high-rise on the corner? What if there’s a stabbing, a shooting,
a serious-injury traffic accident? How would an aid car, fire engine or
police cruiser get through that sea of people? The cop in me supported
the decision to clear the intersection. But the chief in me should have
vetoed it. And he certainly should have forbidden the indiscriminate
use of tear gas to accomplish it, no matter how many warnings we barked
through the bullhorn.My support for a militaristic solution caused all hell to break
loose. Rocks, bottles and newspaper racks went flying. Windows were
smashed, stores were looted, fires lighted; and more gas filled the
streets, with some cops clearly overreacting, escalating and prolonging
the conflict. The “Battle in Seattle,” as the WTO protests and their
aftermath came to be known, was a huge setback—for the protesters,
my cops, the community.
Did anybody consider informing the protesters of the issues and asking
for cooperation,
or checking to see if there were alternate routes for emergency vehicles,
or….
Hey, I’m not a professional emergency responder, but surely there
must be a plan B in case some major intersection is out of commission
due to a water main blowout, natural gas leak, earthquake, or whatever.
This article was published a few days before the UC Davis pepper spray events,
but the author explicitly cites what happened to Scott Olsen in Oakland
and the arrests in Atlanta, saying those are continuations of the same
problems he experience in Seattle in 1999.
Then he gets into why:
CCA really doesn’t like community opposition, so apparently it works
Private prison company CCA, which in conjunction with ALEC promotes laws in dozens of states and nationally that lock up more people for CCA’s private profit at taxpayer expense, really doesn’t like
community opposition to siting private prisons in their communities.
Hm, why would CCA hate community opposition so much, unless it works?
Not quite rolling his eyes when she mentions visiting communities,
CCA’s video pair disparage
community opposition to private prisons
on their own web page,
When Corrections Meets Communities:
Question:
There are Web sites and blogs that are adamantly opposed to your company
and industry, and they provide negative information about you. Why?
Hm, you mean like some of the material on this blog?
Answer:
CCA and all corrections companies recognize the ongoing efforts
of local, loosely formed grassroots groups and national, well-funded
associations that jointly oppose the establishment of partnership
prisons, many for self-serving reasons. Such groups go to great lengths
to attack, criticize and misrepresent the entire industry. They make false
allegations and often rely on hearsay and unreliable sources. Regrettably,
these biased groups often resort to misinformation and inflammatory
rhetoric to turn isolated incidents into broad generalizations about
the corrections industry as a whole.
Well-funded? Har! OK, not this blog.
That plus we provide evidence, like
Ohio selling off prisons
The governor of Ohio created a budget shortfall, and wants to solve it
by selling off private prisons in “a yard sale” in a recession,
like “a junkie” for “his next fix.”
According to testimony by a nonpartisan research institute:
“The biggest source of Ohio’s budget problem is not overspending or
compenstation for public employees. It is a reduction in revenue.
…
The tax changes also were weighted to high-income Ohioans. More than 40
percent of the income-tax cuts are going to the five percent of families
with income of $135,000 or more a year. Meanwhile, the bottom three-fifths
of Ohio families will receive just 13 percent of the total tax cut.
According to a recent poll,
the people of Ohio think this is unfair and don’t believe the governor
can fix the budget without raising taxes.
There are other reasons selling off prisons to private prison
companies such as CCA is a bad idea.
Mark Niquette wrote for Bloomberg 29 June 2011,
Kasich Tries to Avoid Arizona’s Mistakes in Ohio Prison Selloff:
Still, Democratic lawmakers, including Representative Matt Lundy of
Elyria, question whether Ohio is making a wise move.“The buyer wins and the taxpayers lose when we sell in the middle of
a recession,” Lundy said during press conference last month, calling
the move “a yard sale.”
Selling assets for “one-time” money is a mistake, Louisiana Treasurer
John Kennedy said. He opposed a plan by Republican Governor Bobby Jindal
to sell three prisons to raise $90 million, a proposal the Legislature
didn’t approve.“A junkie can sell his TV or his stereo or his iPod and generate money
for his next fix,” Kennedy, also a Republican, said in a telephone
interview from Baton Rouge, Louisiana. “But if he’s going to ever
get well, he needs to face his addiction.”
An even better quote in that story comes from CCA’s own Steve Owen:
Call Off the Global Drug War —Jimmy Carter
Jimmy Carter in the New York Times 16 June 2011,
Call Off the Global Drug War
said the
Global Commission on Drug Policy:
… has made some courageous and profoundly
important recommendations in a report on how to bring more effective
control over the illicit drug trade. The commission includes the former
presidents or prime ministers of five countries, a former secretary
general of the United Nations, human rights leaders, and business and
government leaders, including Richard Branson, George P. Shultz and Paul
A. Volcker.The report describes the total failure of the present global antidrug
effort, and in particular America’s “war on drugs,” which was
declared 40 years ago today. It notes that the global consumption of
opiates has increased 34.5 percent, cocaine 27 percent and cannabis 8.5
percent from 1998 to 2008. Its primary recommendations are to substitute
treatment for imprisonment for people who use drugs but do no harm
to others, and to concentrate more coordinated international effort
on combating violent criminal organizations rather than nonviolent,
low-level offenders.These recommendations are compatible with United States drug policy from
three decades ago. In a message to Congress in 1977, I said the country
should decriminalize the possession of less than an ounce of marijuana,
with a full program of treatment for addicts. I also cautioned against
filling our prisons with young people who were no threat to society, and
summarized by saying: “Penalties against possession of a drug should
not be more damaging to an individual than the use of the drug itself.”
Imagine that!
A drug policy meant to address the problem.
How did we go wrong?