Tag Archives: Law

GABEO annual conference in Quitman 24-26 February 2012 —Fannie M. Jackson

Received Saturday on

Quitman 10 and Americans right to vote —George Rhynes
. -jsq



GABEO-Georgia Association of Black Elected Officials to hold annual
conference in Q-town February 24, 25, 26, 2012. We are so THANKFUL that
OTHERS HEAR and UNDERSTAND what happened in BROOKS.
And we would love
to meet you here!!! God bless ALL of you and God will continue to bless
Brooks and America.

-Fannie M. Jackson

Video of

GABEO press conference about Quitman 10
.
Here is GABEO‘s
2012 Quitman conference

hotel information
.
Here’s the

conference schedule
:




GABEO Annual Winter Conference

“Living the Dream – Save the Voting Rights Act”

February 24– 26, 2012

Hosts: “The Quitman 10” A Change Movement!

Headquarters: Shumate Street Church of Christ

301 Shumate Street, Quitman, GA 31643

229-263-8329

Continue reading

Who are the “local leadership” who approved CCA’s private prison?

They’re even quieter about it than the Industrial Authority,
but the Valdosta City and Lowndes County governments are in the
private prison deal just as deep.

Jay Hollis, CCA’s Manager of Site Acquisition, in his

Valdosta-Lowndes County, GA / CCA Partnership: Prepared Remarks

of August 2010, wrote:



Our Valdosta/Lowndes County site quickly became our primary due to its
local and regional workforce, collaboration of local leadership, site
characteristics, proximity to necessary services and infrastructure,
and accessibility to name a few.

So who is this local leadership?

We look forward to working closely with Valdosta/Lowndes leadership as we move forward in the months to come.

Finally, I’d like to take a moment to recognize a few folks that have been essential to the project:

Continue reading

Why did CCA pick Lowndes County for a private prison?

Apparently CCA picked Lowndes County for a private prison for reasons
that were

not what VLCIA’s consultant seemed to think would influence the selection.



According to

Valdosta-Lowndes County, GA / CCA Partnership: Talking Points

(undated, but it refers to

“The agreement formalized by the Industrial Authority on 8/17”
),

The Valdosta/Lowndes site became the primary due to the local and
regional workforce, collaboration of local leadership,
site characteristics,
proximity to necessary services and infrastructure, accessibility, etc.

Nothing in there about

low poverty or high wages.

One could even read that the other way around,
as in a low-wage population looking for jobs.

Looks to me like our Industrial Authority didn’t do much due diligence
about private prisons.

Also note that the contract of 17 August 2010 between VLCIA and CCA
was signed after the announcement in July 2010 that CCA had selected
Decatur County.
More about that in another post.

-jsq

Apparently VLCIA misunderstood what CCA was looking for

Apparently VLCIA, or one of its expert consultants,
thought CCA was looking for a thriving county economy
in choosing a private prison location.
That doesn’t seem to be what happened.


Economic Impact of Project Excel

by Clifford A. Lipscomb, Ph.D., 2 November 2009:

The VLCIA has noted that Project Excel is considering other
locations. Below I provide a comparison of key economic indicators for
these alternative counties — Grady and Decatur.

Table 1. Characteristics of Selected Counties
Variable Decatur Grady Lowndes
Population, 2008 28,823 25,115 104,583
% Pop w/ Bachelor’s degree 12.1% 10.6% 19.7%
Median HH Income, 2007 32,650 33,060 38,666
Persons below poverty, 2007 22.5% 22.2% 20.5%
Persons white non-Hispanic, 2008 54.8% 60.6% 60.0%

In closing, it appears that Project Excel is an excellent candidate for
location in Lowndes County.

So which other county did CCA actually pick?

Continue reading

CCA documents from VLCIA



All the CCA documents VLCIA provided in response to Matt Flumerfelt’s Open Records Request
are
on the LAKE website.
I will continue posting what I see in them (in the category
CCA), but you may find things in them I don’t.
If you find something particularly interesting, please send it to the
LAKE blog submission address or comment on the blog so we can all see it.

-jsq

Missing: CCA Submission of Preliminary Specifications

Has CCA supplied a key document required by the contract?
If not, is the contract still valid?

According to “SCHEDULE 1.6.2 DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE”
CCA was supposed to provide to VLCIA



Submission of Preliminary Specifications (Section 1.6.1)

No later than 6 months after receipt of the Survey

CCA did provide a

Title Objection Letter

19 November 2010,
and that was due “within 30 days of receipt of the Survey”.
So these Preliminary Specifications were due
about six months ago.
Let’s see them!

If those specifications have not been received by VLCIA,
maybe the contract with CCA is no longer valid.

Or maybe VLCIA already received

the NTP

and is moving on with implementing the project.
Seems to me the community should be informed, one way or the other.

-jsq

How the Industrial Authority can stop the CCA private prison: no third extension by 13 March 2012

Apparently the Industrial Authority can end the contract for CCA’s private prison
six weeks from now, by simply not doing anything until then.

CCA has already paid for two extensions on their Option Agreement
for land purchase.


The

Second Extension Term

was paid for in March 2010

and forwarded to the land owner.

Here’s video of

Col. Ricketts announcing it to
the VLCIA board 15 March 2011.

That second extension expires 13 March 2012, six weeks from today.

A Third Extension Term is possible, but has to be negotiated.
Here’s what

Purchase and Development Agreement
of 17 August 201
says:

1.4.2.3. Third Extension Term.
The Authority shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain an option
for a third extension term of twelve (12) months
(the “Third Extension Term“).
In the event the Authority is able to obtain such extension option
on terms and conditions such that any required earnest money to be paid
by the Company in connection with the exercise of such extension option does not
exceed $75,000, and there is no increase of the price of the Site
or any other payments not already required by the Option Agreement,
then the Authority shall enter into a written agreement
(the “Third Extension Term“)
with the Seller reflecting the terms and conditions of such extension option….

What happens if the Authority does not provide such an extension option?

Continue reading

CCA and the problem with Industrial Authority confidentiality agreements

In the

confidentiality agreeement

CCA and VLCIA signed way back on 17 August 2009,
I see nothing that says the Industrial Authority can’t talk about CCA
in general terms.
And I see a lot of things that a governmental entity by state law
can’t hide if the public requests them.
And that VLCIA has now revealed.
Which means the Industrial Authority has violated that agreement because
state law required it to.
So what does that say about the validity of other contracts VLCIA
has signed with CCA?
And what does it say about the practice of this governmental entity
signing confidentiality agreements?

That agreement includes this legal boilerplate:



it will use any confidential, proprietary, or trade secret information to
which it has access solely for the purpose set forth herein and that it will
indefinitely protect the confidentiality of such information and will not
directly or indirectly disclose, reproduce, distribute, transmit or transfer
by any means in any form any confidential documents, information
and/or trade secrets that AUTHORITY may have or acquire during the
Evaluation Period.

There’s nothing in there that says VLCIA can’t even say in their board
meetings that Project Excel is a private prison for CCA.
And outside board meetings, some board members have no reluctance to
acknowledge that.

Confidentiality agreements like that are normal between two business entities.
They seem a little odd between a business entity and a governmental agency.
For example, that Agreement continues:

For purposes of this Agreement, “confidential, proprietary, or trade
secret information” includes, but is not limited to, marketing materials,
conceptual site drawings and images, form contract agreements, the
identities of business contacts and the relationships developed with
such contacts during the Evaluation Period, proposed terms of purchase
and sale, if any….

Yet many of those things are by their nature public records that VLCIA
is required to hand over in response to an open records request,
such as the one Matt Flumerfelt made which produced documents such as these:

Continue reading

Pop the drug war balloon: legalize and regulate the drug trade —Terry Nelson, LEAP

LTE in the

WSJ, 21 January 2012:

The article illustrates what I learned over my 30-year career as a
federal agent: Cracking down in one place doesn’t make drugs


disappear, it only moves the trade elsewhere. This so-called
“balloon effect,” combined with the insatiable demand for drugs
across the globe, means that no level of law-enforcement skill or
dedication can make a significant dent.

The only way to pop the proverbial balloon is to legalize and
regulate the drug trade, which would eliminate the opportunity to
make enormous black-market profits. It wasn’t easy for me to come to
this revelation after dedicating so many years to enforcing drug
laws, but it is common sense. Law-enforcement officers don’t have to
chase gangsters selling booze from town to town because we ended the
failed experiment of alcohol prohibition decades ago. It is time we
do the same for other drugs.

Terry Nelson

Executive Board Member

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

Granbury, Texas

And that will pop the incarceration bubble, as well, according to

CCA’s own 2010 report to the SEC.
-jsq

“We’ve been chosen” —Barbara Stratton

Received Saturday on
Public hearing doesn’t mean the public gets to know anything
. -jsq

I’ve made these same comments before. It’s just part of the attitude that

is popular with some elected & appointed officials “We’ve been chosen. Now
go away & don’t ask any questions about what we are doing until it’s time
to vote again.” I don’t think all the individuals share the attitude,
but some do & over time it has become standard procedure. Hopefully,
as more citizens pay attention & ask for more insight procedure will
adjust. There is a reason for open meetings & sunshine laws & it’s not
so citizens can listen to or read about decisions based on information
they are not allowed to hear or observe.

-Barbara Stratton