Southern California Edison bet on big baseload nuclear, and
has been out two units for eight months and counting.
Big baseload turns quickly from 24/7 to 0/7.
Tentative plans are forming for a restart, which will take
many more months, if ever.
Wouldn’t distributed solar and wind be quicker and smarter?
In Georgia, as well as California?
Michael R. Blood wrote for AP yesterday,
Troubled Calif. nuke plant aims to restart reactor,
The company announced plans to repair and restart one of two damaged
reactors, Unit 2, at reduced power to hopefully halt vibration that
has caused excessive wear to scores of tubes that carry radioactive
water. The outlook for its heavily damaged sister, Unit 3, appears
grim and no decision on its future is expected until at least next
summer.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is expected to take months to
review the plan, and there is no timetable to restart the plant.
There are a few signs that the eventual outcome is dawning on some utility people.
Plans are already taking shape that envision lower output from San
Onofre at least into 2013.
“Whenever you lose generation, it has implications,” said San Diego
Gas & Electric spokeswoman Jennifer Ramp.
Well, yeah, and losing big blocks of power is one of the implications
of depending on a few big baseload plants in the first place.
Distributed
solar
and
wind wouldn’t have this problem.
-jsq