Continue readingFrom: “John S. Quarterman”
To: Brad Lofton
Cc: [see below]Since I know of no public email address for the VLCIA board, I’m asking Brad Lofton to distribute this to the board before their meeting tomorrow.
Dear Board,
This is an update to my previous question to you, which was published in the Valdosta Daily Times, 20 Dec 2010, available online here:
http://lake.typepad.com/on-the-lake-front/2010/12/whats-the-industrial-authoritys-plan.html
I’m sending this letter directly to you, and also publishing it online,
http://lake.typepad.com/on-the-lake-front/2010/12/what-is-your-plan.html
What is the Industrial Authority’s plan to bring in real clean jobs?
Your staff have claimed that Wiregrass Power LLC’s tiny solar plant plus their biomass plant will make us a “center of innovation excellence for renewable and sustainable energy in Georgia.” Is that all?
If so, let me make a few suggestions.
Category Archives: Education
LAKE visits Blazer Gardens at VSU

Greenhouse A will have squash, peppers, and tomatoes, and already has some citrus growing in it; jsq gets a taste:
It all starts with composting. Bobbi and Erin Hurley of SAVE help raise awareness about clean local foods.
Bobbi and Jim Parker discuss how it’s good for you and tastes good, too! Continue reading
VDT and WCTV on WACE anti-biomass meeting

Experts from a variety of fields presented the health risks, pollution and water issues, and other concerns involved with the construction of a biomass plant in Valdosta Thursday at the Wiregrass Activists for Clean Energy (WACE) forum held Thursday evening.

Even the caption on the VDT picture is telling: Continue reading
Tiny LAKE is flattered by mighty VLCIA!
Continue readingTo: Brad Lofton
From: John S. Quarterman
Cc: [see below]
Subject: Re: VDT EditorialHowdy,
Tiny LAKE is flattered to be asked to repost VDT materials for mighty VLCIA! But to answer your question, this is a blog, not a newspaper, nor a wire service for a newspaper. LAKE also hasn’t posted all of the letters to the editor of the VDT pro and con on this subject or others of interest to us.
More basically, you seem to continue to confuse “VLCIA answered” with “the answers satisfied the questioners” or “the answers actually addressed the content of the questions” or “nobody is questioning anymore”.
Questions continued to be asked at the VLCIA “Forum” of 6 Dec 2010. I ask again:
Re: Videos from First Presbyterian Church, 6 Jan 2011

From: “Mary B. Gooding”Continue reading
To: “John S. Quarterman”
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:28:59 +0000
Subject: RE: Videos from First Presbyterian Church, 6 Jan 2011John – Thanks!
Mary B. Gooding
Director of Marketing and Community Relations
Valdosta State University
229-333-7444
FAX 229-245-3891IT’S A GREAT DAY TO BE A BLAZER!
—–Original Message—–
“their ‘assurances’ … remain empty words.” –Dr. Noll
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 14:19:00 +0000Good morning everyone.
As a scientist and President of WACE it is my duty to point out that, more than three weeks after their latest panel, Mr. Lofton and the Industrial Authority have, yet again, not been able to share conclusive evidence with the community that biomass is safe. At the same time, WACE has time and again provided scientific studies and statements made by medical organizations that prove that biomass incineration bears significant health risks for our community.
Evidence provided by the pro-biomass panelists on December 6 (none of whom were medical professionals or represented a medical organization) was at best circumstantial, as can be expected from such a one-sided panel. Moreover, neither Dr. Teaf nor any of the other panelists have given us any evidence since then that biomass is safe, as their presentations lacked any sources or links to check the validity of their statements (see attached presentation from Dr. Teaf as an example). In other words, their “assurances” too that biomass is “safe”, like those repeatedly made by the Industrial Authority, remain empty words. The time for playing semantics and simply “assuring” our community that biomass is safe, without providing scientific studies to back up such claims, is over.
(The same pattern of mis-information can be observed in regard to claims that the biomass project is supported by groups like the Sierra Club, that biomass incineration is carbon neutral, or that biomass is economically speaking a safe investment. WACE will address these too on January 13.)
With best regards and wishes for a Healthy New Year,
Michael G. Noll, President
Wiregrass Activists for Clean Energy
“It is your responsibility to prove us wrong” –Dr. Noll to Mr. Lofton
From: “Michael G. Noll”Continue reading
To: “blofton@industrialauthority.com” <blofton@industrialauthority.com>, “Mary B. Gooding”, “Ricketts, Allan” <aricketts@industrialauthority.com>, “Copeland, Roy”, “‘John S. Quarterman'”, “Susan R. Wehling”, Kay Harris
Subject: RE: Wiregrass Power, LLC
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 21:19:15 +0000Hello Mr. Lofton.
You might remember that WACE handed out a “Myth vs. Fact” info sheet at the meeting. On it were clearly outlined major issues we have with your biomass project. I will only entertain the first three to refresh your memory, since they are the most important facts for our community:
“Your memory doesn’t serve you correctly” –Lofton to Noll
From: Brad Lofton <blofton@industrialauthority.com>Continue reading
To: Michael Noll, “Mary B. Gooding”, Allan Ricketts <aricketts@industrialauthority.com>, Roy Copeland, “John S. Quarterman, “Susan R. Wehling”, Kay Harris
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:51:53 -0500
Subject: Re: Wiregrass Power, LLCGood morning Dr. Noll-
Thanks for your e-mail. With all due respect, however, your memory doesn’t serve you correctly, and I would ask you to please review your notes again. The environmental consultant from Golder referred extensively to a seven month environmental analysis performed by the EPD in our state. I’m confused why a seven month study performed by the impartial environmental and regulatory group empowered to provide governance and decisions related to this project isn’t a sufficient enough environmental study for you. During the forum, Golder and Associates, a world renown environmental engineering firm, also went on to provide results of their extensive air modeling study. The fuel supply expert presented the results of a detailed study his firm had just completed that showed 13 times the required regional wood waste fuel needed for this plant. This was his firm’s 20th study across the country, and they are considered experts. The Ph.D economist cited an extensive study his firm had just completed successfully defending a similar biomass facility before the Wisconsin Public Service Commission. The Toxicologist has over 27 years of experience and is a leading expert at a major U.S. University. If you would read his CV,
“Your determination to sell our community your biomass project” –Dr. Noll to Brad Lofton
From: “Michael G. Noll”Continue reading
To: Brad Lofton <blofton@industrialauthority.com>, “John S. Quarterman, Allan Ricketts, <aricketts@industrialauthority.com>
CC: “Susan R. Wehling”, “Mary B. Gooding”, Roy Copeland, Kay Harris
Subject: RE: Wiregrass Power, LLC
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:46:25 +0000Hello Mr. Lofton.
I can certainly admire your determination to sell our community your biomass project as “green” or “safe”. However, as WACE already pointed out, there is a difference between fiction and fact (see my guest column in the VDT on December 12, 2010).
In the last couple months, WACE has provided the Industrial Authority and the community with a plethora of scientific literature and statements made by medical organizations that unequivocally state that biomass is neither “green” nor “safe”. At the same time, neither you nor Mr. Ricketts have been able to provide up-to-date scientific proof to us to challenge the position that biomass is, in fact, dirtier than coal and bears significant health risks.
Anyone who cares enough for the community he or she lives in, must understand the responsibility to provide such proof. I have difficulties to imagine that you or Mr. Ricketts do not share such a sentiment, despite the disagreements we might have. Let’s cut to the chase in regard to your panel of experts:
Brad Lofton: “Please have anyone interested e-mail us directly.”
To: John S. Quarterman, Allan Ricketts <aricketts@industrialauthority.com>,Continue reading
From: Brad Lofton <blofton@industrialauthority.com>
Cc: John S. Quarterman, Michael Noll, Susan Wehling, Mary B. Gooding, Roy Copeland, Kay Harris
Subject: Re: Wiregrass Power, LLC
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:49:56 -0500John-
We enjoyed having you Tuesday night, and we were especially glad to have you attend on the night we planned to review the expert panel’s testimony regarding the positive environmental, health and economic impacts of our project. We appreciate you agreeing today to provide all of that data (or at least links) on your blog plus the recent flurry of pro-biomass press releases. As you know, December has been very active with EPA and USDA releases promoting biomass plus GA Tech and Duke researchers announcing that renewable energy (including biomass) will save Southeastern U.S. ratepayers $23 billion a year by 2030. That’s great news for residential and industrial consumers alike. The unanimous permission granted for the Gainesville, FL biomass facility was good news, and we were amazed at the large amount of support they received-from the FL State Department of Health, to the guardians of the Suwannee River basin, the U.S. Corps of Engineers, and numerous government and environmental groups in between.
Regarding access to our panel info, we have already e-mailed our panelists’ presentations to members of the public, and we would be more than happy to continue doing that. Please have anyone interested e-mail us directly.