I wonder if there is any way for the Industrial Authority, County Commission
and City Council to now do the right thing for Lowndes County.
How can they save face?
Reading the scientific data makes it clear that an error was made,
and clearly this data wasn’t made available to those who have been
charged with finding appropriate industry for us,
industry that will raise the quality of life for the citizens of Lowndes County
by providing good jobs.
They can be excused for an industry that provides only a few jobs.
Jobs are jobs, after all. But how can we help them apologize to all
of us and thank those citizens who have spent so many hours
of their own time gathering information and providing a forum to educate us?
I wish it were possible.
More
from the NAACP
about Wiregrass Power LLC’s proposed biomass plant.
-jsq
From: Leigh Touchton
Subject: NAACP Georgia State Conference asks EPA for review of Wiregrass permit
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:39:26 -0500
To: [numerous parties]
Apparently some people have incorrect information about the Georgia State
NAACP Conference position. Please see attached.
Giving up on answering
Dr. Sammons latest,
Brad Lofton resorts to the xenophobia card.
-jsq
From: Brad Lofton
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:07:16 -0500
Cc: [Dr. Noll, Kay Harris, jsq, lhenderson, hopeforcleanwater]
To: “Bill” [Sammons, Leigh Touchton], aricketts@industrialauthority.com
Subject: Re: Background information on Dr. Christopher Teaf
Thanks again for your e-mail Dr. Sammons. As we have said multiple
times now, we are satisfied with the safety of this plant, the numerous
experts that have approved it, and the due diligence we have done. You
can continue to send ten e-mails a day, yet our position remains the
same. I hope the weather is nice today in Massachusetts.
BL
Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
From: Bill [Sammons]
Cc: [Dr. Noll, Kay Harris, jsq, lhenderson, hopeforcleanwater]
To: blofton@industrialauthority.com, leigh.touchton@gmail.com,
aricketts@industrialauthority.com, [Roy Copeland, Mary Gooding]
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:44:54 -0500
Subject: Re: Background information on Dr. Christopher Teaf
Dear Mr. Lofton:
Having talked with many different people in different departments
in multiple state governments I do not think that any of them
would suggest that granting a permit is the same as “do nothing but
evaluate the safety of these projects”. When asked they all say the are
following the guidelines set out by EPA/state regulations– they are
not evaluating the safety of each project. Many will admit in private
that the regulations/guidelines are not up to date with science, but
the people in the permitting agencies do not have the authority to grant
the permit based on the best available science/data. It’s not dissimilar
to discussions of BACT– depending on the size of the stationary source
not all BACT is the same.
As an example if you look at the EPA regulations on PM 2.5
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:20:06 -0500
Subject: Background information on Dr. Christopher Teaf
From: Leigh Touchton
To: Brad Lofton <blofton@industrialauthority.com>,
aricketts@industrialauthority.com,
[Roy Copeland, Mary Gooding]
Cc: [Sammons, Noll, Kay Harris, jsq, lhenderson, hopeforcleanwater]
To Industrial Authority Board:
In regards to the email correspondence from VLCIA Executive Director Brad
Lofton concerning Dr. Christopher Teaf, I spent about ten minutes on the
internet researching Dr. Christopher Teaf’s numerous paid endorsements
around the country for various chemicals. This article
was compelling. Dr. Teaf is on public record endorsing the safety of
arsenic in wood as posing no health threats to children (or adults).
Numerous lawsuits around the country were adjudicated against his “expert
findings” and subsequently the EPA banned CCA (arsenic) treated wood in
playground equipment because of the health hazards to children.
I only spent about ten minutes, but I uncovered much information re:
From: Bill
Date: Thursday, January 20, 2011 4:35 PM
To: blofton@industrialauthority.com; aricketts@industrialauthority.com
Cc: mgnoll@valdosta.edu; leigh.touchton@gmail.com
Subject: Radio interview
Hi
I just listened to Mr. Lofton’s radio interview. It seemed that he was
indicating there was substantiating documentation on the IA webpage to
support biomass combustion. I could not find it. The videos of the meeting
do not constitute valid information.
Could you send me the url[s] where the information is presented on the web
page please.
I also would like specific documentation that the plant will not produce
dioxin as he asserts in the interview.
If the air in Lowndes County is clean, why is Valdosta high
in cancers of the lung, trachea, bronchus, and pleura,
and not especially high in other cancers?
It appears to be the mainly conservative power structure of Lowndes
trying to force this business venture into Valdosta’s community and not
considering the environmental dangers.
He has some interesting points, such as who just got
appointed to the EPD.
I think he overestimates the power of the Valdosta mayor, however.
“protective apparel, infection control and extended care products in
addition to a line of construction weatherization building products for
the housing market.”