Does the county ordinance that adversely affects Deep South Sanitation
and no other company follow a pattern already set by the county?
The VDT posted pictures clearly taken not from the media box during
last night’s

Regular Session of the Lowndes County Commission:
this one shows Gretchen videoing for LAKE from that media box.
Has the Lowndes County Commission granted an exclusive franchise
to the VDT for photographing, like the one it granted to ADS for trash collection?
Or has the Commission admitted its anti-videoing ordinance was actually
an illegal bill of attainder directed at LAKE alone?
If so, why is it still posted on the door?
And why is the county still planning to sue Deep South Sanitation
on account of an ordinance and contract that directly adversely
affects no other business?
Hm, could that also be an illegal bill of attainder?

In case you had any doubt the VDT’s pictures were taken during the actual
Commission meeting in session, this one is of

Steve Parker speaking in Citizens Wishing to be Heard.

Even the Cumming City Council, which

illegally ejected Nydia Tysdale for videoing an open meeting,
realized its error and she now

videos from the front row.
Only Lowndes County, Georgia continues to post a sign on the door
saying all videoing and photographing must be from the back of the room.
And then it lets one news organization violate its own ordinance,
but not another.

To quote

former Chairman Ashley Paulk:

Mr Quarterman, The County Commission wishes from this day forward that any filming be done from the media area in the back corner of the room.

The next day, the Commission

passed an ordinance that wasn’t on the agenda and wasn’t read to the public.
In response to an open records request by somebody else,
a copy of the notice that’s still posted on the meeting room door
was returned.
It says it’s a notice, not an ordinance. It reads:

NOTICE

Any person videoing or photographing a meeting of the Board of
Commissioners of Lowndes County shall remain in the area designated
for videographers and photographers in the back of the Commission
Chamber and shall ensure that any video or photography equipment is
located in the area desginated for videographers and photographers,
unless otherwise permitted by the presiding Commissioner.

Any person failing to comply with this Notice shall be subject to
removal from the Commission Chamber.

[signed] Ashley Paulk Chairman, Board of Commissioners September 13, 2011

We already documented exceptions
11 October 2011 when several other people photographed and apparently
videoed from various places in the room,
with Chairman Paulk looking straight at one of them as she
pointed her camera at him; that’s Commissioner Richard Raines to Paulk’s right.
Now the VDT does the same thing.

In case you’re wondering,

the pictures I took 14 May 2013 were before the meeting started,


as you can tell by Commissioners still wandering around the room.
LAKE has been careful to scrupulously follow the notice or ordinance
or whatever it is.

And it appears that nobody except LAKE is required to follow
that ordinance.
Which brings to mind this:

“No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law will be passed.”

—U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 9, paragraph 3

A bill of attainder is “A legislative act that singles out an individual or group for punishment without a trial.”
Founding father James Madison, who probably wrote that clause, said

in Federalist number 44, 1788:

“Bills of attainder, ex post facto laws, and laws impairing the
obligations of contracts, are contrary to the first principles of
the social compact, and to every principle of sound legislation. …
The sober people of America are weary of the fluctuating policy
which has directed the public councils. They have seen with regret
and indignation that sudden changes and legislative interferences,
in cases affecting personal rights, become jobs in the hands of
enterprising and influential speculators, and snares to the
more-industrious and less-informed part of the community.”

Hm,
“impairing the obligations of contracts” as in Deep South Sanitation’s contracts
with its customers?
And “jobs in the hands of enterprising and influential speculators”
like

the investors from New York City that own ADS?
As
Steve Parker put it:

…taking a family-owned Lowndes County business that pays taxes in Lowndes County,
and moves that money to a company headquartered in New York.

It was Commissioner Richard Raines

who made the motion to pass the anti-videoing ordinance;
it was Raines

who moved to pass the Solid Waste Ordinance,
and
it was Raines
who moved to pass the Exclusive Franchise Agreement for Residential Solid Waste Collection Services with Advanced Disposal Services of Central Alabama, Inc.
Commissioner Richard Raines, who yesterday prayed for

“the freedoms we enjoy”. The freedoms four people complained
later in that same meeting his solid waste ordinance and exclusive franchise infringe upon.

We know

the county plans to enforce what could well be an illegal bill
of attainder against Deep South Sanitation,
because

the Chairman refused to even explain
the

civil action lawsuit against DSS with preliminary hearing

14 June 2013 at 9:30 AM.
Congratulations, DSS, on joining the club of very few organizations
that’s had the Lowndes County Commission pass an ordinance against it!

Is this the kind of local government we want,
whose “sudden changes and legislative interferences,
in cases affecting personal rights”
affect specific individuals or groups?

-jsq