Tag Archives: Harvey Wasserman

San Onofre Off Forever Soon

People standing up for safety and sanity may yet stop big business nukes.
After San Onofre is finally off for good, how about let’s cancel Plant Vogtle?
-jsq



Harvey Wasserman wrote for nukefree.org 16 May 2013,

San Onofre at the No Nukes Brink
,

In January, it seemed the restart of San Onofre Unit 2 would be a
corporate cake walk.

Edison billed southern California ratepayers roughly $1 billion for
San Onofre in 2012 even though it generated no juice.

With its massive money and clout, Southern California Edison was
ready to ram through a license exception for a reactor whose botched
$770 million steam generator fix had kept it shut for a year.

But a funny thing has happened on the way to the restart: a No Nukes
groundswell has turned this routine rubber stamping into an epic
battle the grassroots just might win.

Indeed, if ever there was a time when individual activism could have

Continue reading

Shutdown at San Onofre: permanent this time?

California only has a couple of nuclear reactor locations (unlike the
32 reactors within 500 miles of here),
and one is in even worse shape than the other: San Onofre,
almost as bad as
Crystal River.
I’m sure Southern Company would never cut corners or have
design or

construction problems
at Plant Vogtle, right?

Harvey Wasserman wrote for AlterNet 7 January 2013,

Showdown at San Onofre: Why the Nuclear Industry May Be Dealt a Big Blow
,

Perched on an ocean cliff between Los Angeles and San Diego, the


reactors’ owners cut unconscionable corners in replacing their
multi-million-dollar steam generators. According to Russell Hoffman,
one of California’s leading experts on San Onofre, inferior metals
and major design failures turned what was meant to be an upgrade
into an utter fiasco.

Installed by Mitsubishi, the generators simply did not work. When
they were shut nearly a year ago, tubes were leaking, banging
together and overall rendering further operations impossible.

Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric have
unofficially thrown in the towel on Unit 3. But they’re lobbying
hard to get at least Unit 2 back up and running. Their technical
problems are so serious that they’ve asked the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission to let them run Unit 2 at 70% capacity. In essence, they
want to “see what happens” without daring to take the
reactor to full power.

The NRC has expressed serious doubts. On December 26 it demanded
answers to more than 30 questions about the plant’s technical realities.
There have been assertions that unless San Onofre can be shown as operable
at full power, its license should be negated.

It’s good the NRC got around to doing something, after

Continue reading

Missouri has defeated CWIP: so can Georgia

A veteran of the original No Nukes movement calls Plant Vogtle
and CWIP like he sees it.

Harvey Wasserman wrote Friday for EcoWatch,

Nuclear Power’s Green Mountain Grassroots Demise
,

The accelerating revolution in renewables has allowed solar, wind


and other green sources to outstrip atomic reactors in cost, time to
build, ecological impact and safety. As billions pour into
Solartopian sources, private investment in atomic energy has all but
disappeared—except where there are massive taxpayer subsidies.

Even that’s not enough. In 2011, President Obama handed $8.33
billion in federal loan guarantees to the builders of two reactors
at Georgia’s Vogtle. But Peach State ratepayers are already being
soaked for billions more in pre-payments, and the cost of the
project is soaring. A parallel financial disaster looms at the
Robinson site in neighboring South Carolina. Though the industry
assumes these four reactors will eventually be finished, economic
realities may say otherwise.

Cost estimates for new nukes have been soaring even before
construction begins. Even with federal money, the builders still
demand that state ratepayers foot the bill as the process proceeds,
meaning consumers are on the hook for multiple billions even if the
reactors never open. Pitched battles over this Construction Work in
Progress scam have already been won by consumers in Missouri and are
being fought in Iowa and elsewhere. As the years of building drag
on, costs will escalate while renewables continue to become cheaper.
Sooner or later, construction is likely to stop, as it did at
numerous projects in the 1970s and 1980s which were never finished.

We can end CWIP in Georgia.
It will benefit Georgia Power and the EMCs as well as all the rest of us
when we stop wasting tax and customer dollars on boondoggles like Plant Vogtle
or biomass or private prisons and get on with clean, profitable, job-creating
renewable energy in Georgia: wind off the coast and sun inland.

-jsq