From: Andrea SchruijerContinue reading
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 3:38 PM
To: ‘Matt Flumerfelt’
Cc: ‘Steve Gupton’
Subject: RE: Notice to Proceed and Preliminary Specifications
Dear Mr. Flumerfelt,In regards to your email of February 6, 2012, CCA has not given to the
Authority a “Development Schedule” and has not received from CCA a “Notice to Proceed.” Under paragraph 1.6.2, except for some due diligence provided for in the agreement, the Parties have no obligation to proceed with design, permitting, installation or construction of the Project, prior to receiving a NTP from CCA. CCA has absolute discretion in issuing or withholding the NTP. After the issuance of the NTP the parties shall proceed with the development of the project in accordance with the Development Schedule.
Sincerely,
Andrea Schruijer
Category Archives: Incarceration
I have become a Fan of Very Supervised Probation —Robert Nagle
My darling 22 year-old daughter wound up with a second DWI, becausePresumably this was for driving while intoxicated (DWI) with alcohol. We tried Prohibition for alcohol back in the 1920s, and repealed it in the 1930s, because it produced criminal gangs while failing to stop people from drinking alcohol. So instead we criminalized the misuse of alcohol such as while driving and legalized, regulated, and taxed purchase of alcohol. And now we mostly don’t actually lock people up for DWI: we put them on supervised probation.the first one was a wrist-slap. Don’t hate me as a parent because of it. But she went to DWI Court in Austin. The year of intense supervision and no-nonsense attitude and her willingness to not fight it (much) has turned her attitude and Life around. Did it suck for her? Why, yes. But, who knows but what it saved someone else’s life? And maybe it saved her own. I have become a Fan of Very Supervised Probation. If she’d gone to jail for six months, I suspect she’d have just come out hating society and gone right back to what put her there.
-Robert Nagle
It’s time to do the same for other drugs. We can’t afford to continue to spend more taxpayer dollars on locking people up than on education.
-jsq
Save money by streamlining the state penal code
Brennan Leathers wrote 6 January 2012, Georgia legislature going back to work State Senator John Bulloch (R-Ochlocknee):
“We’re still struggling to find revenue to pay for operationWhich would mean fewer people in prison. Which would mean no need for new prisons. And some existing prisons might close.of the state government and its services,” Bulloch said. “We’re going to have to fill holes that we filled during worse economic times using federal stimulus money and other temporary money.”
Bulloch said he also understands Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal has instructed Georgia’s department heads to include 2-percent cuts in their budget requests for this year.
One way in which legislators might opt to save money is by streamlining its criminal penal code. According to Bulloch, Georgia has a very high number of people serving supervised probation or parole.
“A lot of those people who are in prison or under close supervision by state officers are serving sentences for non-violent offenses or minor felonies,” Bulloch said. “We may look at alternative means for dealing with them, such as creating drug courts or setting up drug-testing centers that would monitor drug offenders without imprisoning them.”
Do we want a private prison in Lowndes County so more prisoners
can compete with local workers here, too?
If you don’t think so, remember
CCA says community opposition
can impede private prison site selection.
Here’s a
petition urging the Valdosta-Lowndes County Industrial Authorithy
to stop the CCA private prison.
Spend those tax dollars on rehabilitation and education instead.
-jsq
Decatur County newspaper wants more prisoners who compete with local wo rkers
Brennan Leathers wrote for the Post-Searchlight 3 January 2010, Walls going up at new ag building,
Which means some local workers with carpentry and construction experience were not working on that project.Work on Decatur County’s new agricultural office building is quickly progressing, with interior walls being put up and the installation of a roof soon to follow.
Decatur County Prison inmates with carpentry and construction experience were working hard last Friday, putting up the interior walls inside the 9,724-square-foot building under construction near the Cloud Agricultural Building off Vada Road.
Do we want a private prison in Lowndes County so more prisoners
can compete with local workers here, too?
If you don’t think so, remember
CCA says community opposition
can impede private prison site selection.
Here’s a
petition urging the Valdosta-Lowndes County Industrial Authority
to stop the CCA private prison.
-jsq
Prison and retirement? —Jane Osborn
I wonder how the news of a private prison with its lowered expectations, minimal guarding procedures and its adding to the prison population we already have will sit with the folks being courted by the Chamber to move here when they retire?-Jane Osborn
Georgia legislature giving unelected bodies bond-issuing privatizing power
as they see fit and to issue bonds to pay for them, putting
we the taxpayers on the hook.
If this bill passes, VLCIA could issue bonds for a private prison,
a biomass plant, a coal plant (apparently not a coincindence; see below),
a toll road, a private railroad,
or whatever it felt like.
It wouldn’t even need
cooperation by elected officials.
It wouldn’t have to go to the Lowndes County Commission for permission,
like
VLCIA did for $15 million in bonds to buy real estate.
The Industrial Authority could just issue the bonds itself!
And we the taxpayers who would have to pay for it?
We’ll just get to pay, that’s all.
There’s still time to stop it in the Georgia Senate.
Maybe HB 475 should be called the “Easy Jobs for Cronies Act”. It adds various definitions of public-private partnership, and then throws in a wild card: Continue reading
Who are the “local leadership” who approved CCA’s private prison?
Jay Hollis, CCA’s Manager of Site Acquisition, in his Valdosta-Lowndes County, GA / CCA Partnership: Prepared Remarks of August 2010, wrote:
So who is this local leadership?Our Valdosta/Lowndes County site quickly became our primary due to its local and regional workforce, collaboration of local leadership, site characteristics, proximity to necessary services and infrastructure, and accessibility to name a few.
We look forward to working closely with Valdosta/Lowndes leadership as we move forward in the months to come.Continue readingFinally, I’d like to take a moment to recognize a few folks that have been essential to the project:
Apparently VLCIA misunderstood what CCA was looking for
Economic Impact of Project Excel by Clifford A. Lipscomb, Ph.D., 2 November 2009:
The VLCIA has noted that Project Excel is considering other locations. Below I provide a comparison of key economic indicators for these alternative counties — Grady and Decatur.So which other county did CCA actually pick? Continue reading
In closing, it appears that Project Excel is an excellent candidate for location in Lowndes County.
Table 1. Characteristics of Selected Counties Variable Decatur Grady Lowndes Population, 2008 28,823 25,115 104,583 % Pop w/ Bachelor’s degree 12.1% 10.6% 19.7% Median HH Income, 2007 32,650 33,060 38,666 Persons below poverty, 2007 22.5% 22.2% 20.5% Persons white non-Hispanic, 2008 54.8% 60.6% 60.0%
CCA documents from VLCIA
All the CCA documents VLCIA provided in response to Matt Flumerfelt’s Open Records Request
are
on the LAKE website.
I will continue posting what I see in them (in the category
CCA), but you may find things in them I don’t.
If you find something particularly interesting, please send it to the
LAKE blog submission address or comment on the blog so we can all see it.
-jsq
Missing: CCA Submission of Preliminary Specifications
According to “SCHEDULE 1.6.2 DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE” CCA was supposed to provide to VLCIA
CCA did provide a Title Objection Letter 19 November 2010, and that was due “within 30 days of receipt of the Survey”. So these Preliminary Specifications were due about six months ago. Let’s see them!Submission of Preliminary Specifications (Section 1.6.1)
No later than 6 months after receipt of the Survey
If those specifications have not been received by VLCIA, maybe the contract with CCA is no longer valid.
Or maybe VLCIA already received the NTP and is moving on with implementing the project. Seems to me the community should be informed, one way or the other.
-jsq




