Tag Archives: EPA

Brad Bergstrom: “unsubstantiated assertions are not facts”

This message from Brad Bergstrom to the Valdosta Board of Education
is as he sent it, except instead of his blue font I’ve formatted
quotations the same as usual for the blog, and as usual I’ve not included
the entire list of email addresses copied.
He’s responding to
Brad Lofton’s message.

-jsq

To all:

I appreciate the opportunity Monday night to have briefly shared my perspective on the environmental impacts of biomass incineration with the BOE. It was at the urging of the "core group" (whom Mr. Lofton seems to disparage, below) that VBOE invited me
and my coleague Dr. Bielmyer to speak. As an ecologist and VSU professor for more than 24 years, I’ve long been interested in issues of conservation, forest resources and sustainable development in south Georgia. About a year-and-a-half ago, I met with Mr.
Ricketts, who kindly gave me and Mr. Seth Gunning a thorough presentation on the proposed biomass plant. Ever since then, I’ve been educating myself on the general issue of biomass power generation and specifically on the Wiregrass plant. I attended the
April 2010 public hearing (as did Mr. Ricketts and Mr. Lofton) conducted by EPD, and I asked several questions. I also submitted several written questions and comments to EPD for the public record, as did many others. All of those questions, and EPD’s answers,
and the complete application, and permit, can be seen here:

http://airpermit.dnr.state.ga.us/gaairpermits/

(After you open this link, type "Wiregrass" into the search box, then click on "Narrative"; the last 13 pages contain all the public comments and responses.)

I’m sure Mr. Lofton is a well-meaning and certainly a tireless advocate for new industry. That is his job. It is the rest of our jobs to determine what really is "fact" and "opinion." No matter how loudly one proclaims it, unsubstantiated assertions are
not facts, and inconvenient facts are not misinformation. I will point out some of these facts, along with links to document them, in blue font, interspersed among Mr. Lofton’s comments, below.

Continue reading →

‘if Mrs. Noll and any of her “experts” would actually meet with us’

Since the appended message was sent to a publicly elected
board chartered by the state of Georgia,
that makes it subject to Georgia’s open records law,
so I am publishing it here.

-jsq

From: Brad Lofton

Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 12:52 PM

To: Karen Ruff Noll, [and Valdosta Board of Education members]

Cc: Allan Ricketts; gkbielmyer@valdosta.edu; bergstrm@valdosta.edu

Subject: Re: Thank you to the Valdosta Board of Education

Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen:

We were honored last night to provide you an update on a project that enjoys
so much support from environmental groups all across America, and we are
thankful for your invitation and partnership. Mrs. Noll won’t admit that no
governmental group or environmental group in this country that is charged
with setting environmental policy is opposed to our project. Not one. In
fact, they collectively point to biomass as the way forward for our country,
where nearly 45 percent of our existing renewable energy portfolio is
biomass. We were prepared last night to go into specific details regarding
the air permit and provide the actual facts for you as opposed to the
continued misinformation you are receiving from this core group. We ran out
of time and apologize for the length. Please let us know when and where we can have that discussion. Our plant will be carbon neutral, with a mercury
level that is so low it’s considered statistically insignificant by EPD.
There is a dramatic difference between what the state and federal law allows
under a statutory air permit and what our plant actually produces. This
group is stating the “permitted” allowances despite the fact that the actual
emissions are a very small fraction of that. Again, if Mrs. Noll and any of
her “experts” would actually meet with us, we would explain that.

Rest assured that this is a safe, green, renewable energy plant

that has
been vetted by scores of environmentalists, all the major universities in
Georgia (including Dr. Tom Manning, a biomass researcher at VSU), and
approved by every level of government. If Mrs. Noll has further concerns, I
would recommend her talking to President Obama, the U.S. Dept of
Agriculture, the U.S. Department of Energy, the Federal Environmental
Protection Agency, the state EPD, the Sierra Club, the World Wildlife
Federation, the state of Georgia’s Center of Innovation for Renewable
Energy, GA Tech, UGA, the Valdosta Daily Times (who support us), and scores
of others who support us.

We will not participate in a back and forth with this group. We’ll be happy
to meet with any of you in person to provide additional information and
facts. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but not the facts. Thanks so much
for what each of you do for our community, and it’s an honor to serve you.

Regards,

Brad

Sent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Verizon

EPA Call for Comments on Biomass Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Monday 13 Sep 2010




Here’s the online EPA call cover page:

On July 9, 2010, OAR Assistant Administrator Gina McCarthy signed a Call for Information in which EPA requests public comment and information from interested parties on approaches to accounting for greenhouse gas emissions from bioenergy and other biogenic sources.

The purpose of this Call is to request comment on developing an approach for such emissions under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V Programs (GHG Tailoring Rule) as well as to receive data submissions about these sources and their emissions, general technical comments on accounting for these emissions, and comments on the underlying science that should inform possible accounting approaches. GHG emissions from bioenergy and other biogenic sources are those generated during combustion or decomposition of biologically-based material, and include sources such as, but not limited to, utilization of forest or agricultural products for energy, wastewater treatment and livestock management facilities, landfills, and fermentation processes for ethanol production.

The EPA page provides several ways to send in comments.

Also, Stop Spewing Carbon Campaign has prepared

this handy link for submitting comments to the call.

See these links for much more about biomass,

especially as proposed for Valdosta and Lowndes County, Georgia,
and

for carbon dioxide in particular. The air quality permit for the Wiregrass Power LLC biomass plant has no restrictions at all on CO2.

-jsq

Europe has clean incinerators; why can’t we?



Elisabeth Rosenthal write in the NY Times about

Europe Finds Clean Energy in Trash, but U.S. Lags:

Far cleaner than conventional incinerators, this new type of plant converts local trash into heat and electricity. Dozens of filters catch pollutants, from mercury to dioxin, that would have emerged from its smokestack only a decade ago.

Here’s the catch:

Denmark now has 29 such plants, serving 98 municipalities in a country of 5.5 million people, and 10 more are planned or under construction. Across Europe, there are about 400 plants, with Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands leading the pack in expanding them and building new ones.

By contrast, no new waste-to-energy plants are being planned or built in the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency says — even though the federal government and 24 states now classify waste that is burned this way for energy as a renewable fuel, in many cases eligible for subsidies. There are only 87 trash-burning power plants in the United States, a country of more than 300 million people, and almost all were built at least 15 years ago.

That means

the biomass plant proposed for Valdosta is not that
kind of clean incinerator.

Biggest polluters in Lowndes County



The New York Times provides an interactive map of water polluters.
According to that map, derived from Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) data mostly from 2004 through 2007,
the biggest offenders in Lowndes County by number of violations are:

62 Moody Air Force Base

42 Arizona Chemical Company

37 Georgia Sheriffs’ Boys Ranch

These are all way ahead of Hahira’s notorious sewer system
(supposed to be fixed now)
and Valdosta’s Mud Creek WPCP (supposed to be being fixed now),
both with 11 violations.
Moody is not surprising, due to sheer size, although disappointing.
The one that surprises me is the Boys Ranch.

Of course, number of violations is just one measure, but it is an interesting one.