Below is a response to my letter of 22 September 2010.
-jsq
Date: On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:16 PM
From: Brad Lofton <blofton@industrialauthority.com>John:
Thank you for your e-mail and the professional way in which you have come
and met with our staff to discuss these issues. I certainly respect your
concerns, especially since you felt it important enough to take the time to
meet with us a number of times to pursue dialogue and exchange information.You are absolutely correct in stating that we provided you peer reviewed
scientific literature proving that biomass plants are indeed carbon neutral.
Dr. Carl Manning, an environmental professor at VSU who has done
significant research in biomass, agrees and completely supports our project.
It is also important to note that we will be using inert landfill material
that would otherwise produce methane if left to rot in a landfill. As you
know, methane is considered a greenhouse gas. This is another very positive
environmental benefit of our project (one of many). Carbon is absolutely
not an issue with our plant.Rest assured that no trees will be harvested for this plant. The plant’s
EPD permit is very specific about this point, and federal tax credits
require the use of “wood waste.” Any deviation will result in plant closure
by the EPD. Our Authority would not have supported “whole log” production,
because of the environmental impact and also because of the competition it
would create for several of our large existing industries (PCA, Langdale)
that count on whole logs for production. We made the use of “wood waste” a
condition of moving forward.A couple of other areas of misinformation that we would like to correct:
