Tag Archives: consolidation

Tracking can help all distributions of students —new research

It turns out tracking students can help all students if done properly.
CUEE’s

invited speaker Terry Jenkins

co-authored a paper
back in 1997 about
Detracking Troup County: Providing an Exemplary Curriculum for All Students.

He appeared to be saying de-tracking was an advantge of school consolidation.
Back then tracking was apparently considered a bad thing.
Recent research shows that actually tracking students can help all
levels of students.
So yet another supposed reason or benefit of consolidation turns out
not to be true.



Esther Duflo, Pascaline Dupas, and Michael Kremer wrote for American Economic Review, 101(5): 1739–74, DOI:10.1257/aer.101.5.1739,

Peer Effects, Teacher Incentives, and the Impact of Tracking: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya

To the extent that students benefit from high-achieving peers, tracking
will help strong students and hurt weak ones. However, all students may
benefit if tracking allows teachers to better tailor their instruction
level. Lower-achieving pupils are particularly likely to benefit from
tracking when teachers have incentives to teach to the top of the
distribution. We propose a simple model nesting these effects and test
its implications in a randomized tracking experiment conducted with
121 primary schools in Kenya. While the direct effect of high-achieving
peers is positive, tracking benefited lower-achieving pupils indirectly
by allowing teachers to teach to their level. (JEL I21, J45, O15)

The first sentence is the standard “diversity” argument that CUEE
keeps making.
The authors state it so as to poing out that their study finds
that it’s far from the whole story.


I find this part especially interesting:

Continue reading

How about as a first step the Chamber pledge… —Jim Parker

Received today on

Why the Chamber Supports Unification
. -jsq


So true, John. There was no meat in the whole letter. The last line sums
it up, “We BELIEVE…” yada, yada, yada. Faith based thinking might
fly in religious institutions, but in the education of our children,
we have a pretty good handle on what is needed. Deferring to those
trained and with years of experience in the education of our children,
who have brought

countless facts to the discussion,
none of which the
Chamber can or has bothered to refute, I will go along with
both Boards of Education
and vote NO to consolidation.

I did note that Mr Gooding offered to “combine our resources and our
efforts and work together as a community to transform two average
school systems…” Since he used the first person plural “our,”

Continue reading

Jobs, Title VI, and education —George Boston Rhynes @ VBOE 25 October 2011



George Rhynes tied together parents, jobs, Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act, and local education at the
VBOE 25 October 2011 open forum.
His question:

If we are concerned about our children really getting an education,
better be concerned about equal employment
and getting federal funds,
so these parents get their equal share of the jobs,
in the community….
I’m talking about the qualified parents
that apply for jobs in this area and some of you know they don’t get them.

[applause]

Here’s

Part 1 of 2:

Continue reading

Schools serving children in poverty well —Karen Noll

Received yesterday. -jsq



From: Karen Noll

To: chamber@valdostachamber.com

Cc: [many other people]

Dear Mr. Gooding and Chamber of Commerce,

In response to

your most recent correspondence
, I dare say many ask why the
Chamber has such a single focus on an unproven plan with little or no
supporting data. Yet again your answers to the many questions about the
reasons that the Chamber is acting in this manner are insufficient and
demonstrate quite clearly that you are steadfastly working to undermine the
very community you claim to support.

Maybe it is my academic background, but I will use data to support my
assertions and hopefully rectify some of the misinformation that has been
so disruptive to this community, a discussion of a very important issue:
the education of our children.

According to

the Chamber’s own study,
education ranked

12th out of 16
factors in importance to businesses coming to our community. The

Chamber’s
own survey
revealed that a low crime rate and the business friendliness of
the local agencies were most important to businesses in 2009.

Our community sadly hosts a large population of children living in poverty,
and education is the best avenue to future success. For this reason, I am
very pleased to report that our economically disadvantaged students in
Valdosta City Schools met or exceeded the expected CRCT scores for the
district last year. This is no small feat and we have some very dedicated
educators to thank for this achievement.

Furthermore, research shows that “larger district size has been shown to be
negatively associated with the achievement of impoverished
students” (
Howley, C. 1996
). This means that the fantastic achievements of
our most disadvantaged students will be reversed in a larger district and
all of the hard work of VCS educators will be lost in order to create, as
you claim, “one great public school system”.

Two years ago the city school district asked Chamber members to provide
input on their Strategic Improvement Plan through an online survey. Only
5.2% of responses came from Chamber members. Valdosta City Schools
encouraged input from all stakeholders, yet these Chamber members in large
part did not respond. Now the Chamber claims to have THE solution for the
schools they had no time for when asked for feedback.

Research consistently shows that bigger does not mean better in education.
So, ‘combining our resources’ does not bring more money, better
educational outcomes, or cost savings. According to the

Lowndes County
Board of Education
consolidation would put a number of teachers out of
work. That would mean fewer customers in local businesses and less tax
revenue. In other words, school consolidation would negatively impact our
local economy and its businesses.

The Chamber is acting irresponsibly toward this community and the children
served by the Valdosta City Schools. I am again appalled by the
callousness of this organization, the petty name calling and repeated
misinformation. It is crystal clear that CUEE and the Chamber are not
interested in what is best for our children.

As a positive and strong community we will rise above the bad apple that
misbehaves and move forward because it is the right thing to do, and we
will continue to model appropriate behavior to our children. At the same
time, we as a community must remember the lesson we have learned today:
‘greed can blind’. We are called to reach out to and to help those in
need. We will continue to work together as a community and work toward the
brightest future for our children.

Thank you, Mr. Gooding, for reminding us again of the path we are called to
take.

Vote No for our children!!

My best wishes to you,

Karen Noll

Why the Chamber Supports Unification —Tom Gooding, Chairman, VLCoC

My opinion is appended. -jsq



Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 11:17:00 -0400 (EDT)

From: Tom Gooding <chamber@valdostachamber.com>

Subject: Why the Chamber Supports Unification

Dear Chamber Members:

Some ask why the Chamber supports school system unification, instead
of focusing
on poverty. The answer is very simple: The Chamber’s mission is to
build a strong
and healthy community, resulting in job opportunities for our citizens,
which addresses poverty. Improving public education is the single most
important thing we can do to build a strong community, grow jobs, and
reduce poverty.

Valdosta’s business community consistently ranks

Continue reading

Financial Issues of Consolidation @ LCBOE 1 November 2011



Video of the open forum Tuesday night at Lowndes High School
where the Lowndes County Board of Education thoroughly addressed
new evidence found by both them and CUEE.
Partly through the information they presented at

their previous forum of 4 October
,
they provoked dialog with CUEE in the form of several email
messages from consolidation proponents distributed by the Chamber of Commerce.
At Tuesday’s forum the Lowndes board and staff took CUEE’s messages
as questions, looked up the answers (for example, how much did
taxes rise in places where there was school consolidation recently?)
and worked the result into their own computations.
The general answer is still that consolidation wouldn’t improve
education and would raise property taxes to near the state-mandated
cap, yet that wouldn’t be enough to preserve all the existing
school programs, and teachers and staff would also have to be
let go.

So the Lowndes Board and the Valdosta board
(several VBOE members plus Supt. Cason were present, and one repeated point was
that the two school boards and staff talk to each other all the time)
used CUEE’s questions to improve the case
against consolidation while promoting community dialog.
They even managed to criticize specific named individuals
for specific messages

Continue reading

All about school consolidation



Update 12:55 3 Nov 2011: LCBOE’s own video of their 1 November open forum on Financial Issues of Consolidation is now available on YouTube.

Apparently there are still many people out there who don’t know much
about school consolidation.
A quick yet comprehensive way to find out is to read the

Grassroots Handbook Against School Consolidation

by David Mullis.



See also the statements against consolidation by
both school boards
.
Many citizens spoke at the

29 August 2011 VBOE meeting

where all but one Valdosta School Board member
voted for the statement against consolidation.
VBOE then held three open forums:

Continue reading

VBOE School Consolidation Forum @ VHS 8 September 2011



This was the first of three forums on school consolidation
hosted by the Valdosta Board of Education.
It was at Valdosta High School on 8 September 2011.

Here’s

a playlist:




VBOE School Consolidation Forum @ VHS 8 September 2011

education, schools, referendum, consolidation, unification,

Forum at Valdosta High School, Valdosta Board of Education (VBOE),

Valdosta, Lowndes County, Georgia, 9 September 2011.

Videos by Gretchen Quarterman for LAKE, the Lowndes Area Knowledge Exchange.

-jsq

Videos of VBOE Education Open Forum 25 October 2011

Here are videos of the entire Open Forum on education


held by the Valdosta
Board of Education at JL Lomax Elementary School 25 October 2011.
This forum was advertised starting

29 August 2011
, almost two months in advance, and was
the third of three forums held by VBOE.
As I asked back back on 1 September,

Where was CUEE at the school board meetings?

One or two showed up at each of the VBOE forums.
Where were the rest of them?

Oh, that’s right!
CUEE’s idea of a forum is to phone up


selected people in the middle of the night to come to

a meeting when both school superintendents are out of town
,
oh, and not invite the newspaper of record.

If you still haven’t been to a real open forum, the Lowndes

Continue reading

Any parent is free to send their children to Valdosta Schools —Susan Wehling @ VBOE 25 October 2011

Susan Wehling made several good points Tuesday, including an invitation for CUEE to put their children where their mouth is, like she already has.



Hi, I’m a parent, and I have three kids in school right now; one just graduated.

First of all, CUEE sent me flyers… to insult my schools….
That was very hurtful for my children to read those flyers
telling them how bad my schools are.
My schools are not bad, and I’m very upset about that.

[applause]

She also said:

Continue reading