Sunday correspondence between Leigh Touchton and Brad Lofton
about Sierra Club support for the biomass plant.
They copied the VDT and the same people as the previous messages.
From: Leigh Touchton
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:50:57 -0400
To: blofton@industrialauthority.comSierra Club:
[quotes Sierra Club passage from
Brad Lofton’s previous message.]I wish someone on the Industrial Authority would actually read the entire
Sierra Club position statement instead of cherry picking snippets they
think supports their incinerator.
http://www.sierraclub.org/policy/conservation/biomass.aspx
From: “Brad Lofton”
To: “Leigh Touchton”
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:08:46 +0000We’ve read it ma’am and appreciate their support.
BLSent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Verizon
From: Leigh Touchton
To: blofton@industrialauthority.com
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:36:50 -0400If you read it then you didn’t comprehend it.
From: “Brad Lofton”
To: “Leigh Touchton”
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:58:04 +0000Leigh!
Thank you for actually addressing a public official. You made my day!!
:) No kidding…
We’ve read this a hundred times, and we understand it perfectly. The
document is clear that the Club does not support “whole log” biomass
plants due to issues of sustain ability. For the record, we stipulated
that Wiregrass may not use whole logs, and their EPD permit prohibits
it. Review a previous e-mail to John Quarterman for further reasons
that include federal taxation credits. The Sierra Club does, however,
in the section we quoted previously, not only support, but fully
recommend wood waste (or agricultural stubble) plants. You can’t argue
what is stated in black and white on their very own web page. We
appreciate you drawing attention to their support for our project. I
hope it doesn’t surprise you that they support a renewable energy
project.Now that you’ve acknowledged me in an e-mail, perhaps you would agree
to meet with my team as we have requested at least 20 times now??!!BL
Sent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Verizon
From: Leigh Touchton
To: blofton@industrialauthority.com
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:40:21 -0400Mr. Lofton,
I have written you about 4 times, you can go back and see the emails you
have received from me, and the very first one was addressed “Mr. Lofton”.
Please address me as Ms. Touchton or President Touchton instead of Leigh,
thank you. No, you did not request a meeting with me 20 times. I requested
that you attend the June Women in the NAACP meeting and you were a no-show.
May we proceed?You are ignoring entire paragraphs in the Sierra Club position statement,
you are cherry picking an isolated snippet out of context and using it,
falsely, as a beacon of support. “Existing Sierra Club policy on siting
energy facilities requires that we oppose facilities which do not fully
protect air and water quality.” That sentence alone disqualifies the
Wiregrass Power biomass incinerator from Sierra Club support, and there’s
more, and it has nothing to do with “whole log” vs. “wood waste”.Read the entire position statement, the Wiregrass Power LLC plant does not
meet the biomass criteria set forth by the national Sierra Club.Furthermore, the medical associations that oppose biomass incinerators
include the American Lung Association and the American Cancer Society and
many more, and their opposition to biomass incinerators does not revolve
around whole-log or wood waste, their opposition is because biomass
incinerators cause death and disease, particularly for elderly, children,
and people with respiratory illness.
From: “Brad Lofton”
To: “Leigh Touchton”
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:59:59 +0000The June meeting of Women in the NAACP Ms. Touchton? Surely you jest.
I’m curious how this invitation was delivered. Along with the Sierra
Club, a number of other environmental groups, and every level of
government, we’ve got ample support we need to move forward, and we
look forward to doing so. For the sake of the minority community and
all of us, I hope you will join us in the future as we try to bring
jobs to Valdosta-Lowndes County. We sure need them. I will not continue
this senseless back and forth with you from this point on. I’d be happy
to meet with you in person if and when you decide to engage with public
officials.
Regards,
BLSent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Verizon
From there the discussion continued about communications methods,
but little was added about the biomass plant, so I omit it here.
-jsq
Apparently he wants me and me alone to sit down with him and he’s unaware that about a dozen NAACP members have already sat down with him, several NAACP Executive Committee members, and none of them were convinced of the advisability of this plant. Tonight he said he requested a meeting with me 6 times. Yesterday he said he requested a meeting with me 20 times. What a silly thing for him to argue about.
NAACP position is clear: the siting of the plant is in a black community and the people most affected by it are black people.