A blog called Rattlin’ Georgia’s Cages

wrote at some unspecified date recently:

I beg to differ with Mr. Pritchard’s opinion regarding “malicious
intent”.

Lowndes County Manager Joe Pritchard says, “I don’t believe through
our investigation, nor through any info we received from the Department
of Ag, are able to indicate any malicious intent.”

Mr. Pritchard should understand that it matters not if this was done
with “malicious intent” or not. “Malicous intent” should be
determined by the investigating criminal agency, not a county manager.
“Malicious Intent” is only important in determining whether the
crime should be filed as a felony, or a misdemeanor.

The law is crystal clear regarding the denial of necessary medical care,
and/or humane euthanasia, for any animal deemed to be in need of such. Any
time a shelter impounds/houses a live animal, the shelter is required,
by law, to afford that animal with humane care – to include necessary
medical care or treatment.

The blogger then goes on to quote Georgia Code, which only brings
in the word “maliciously” for higher fines or imprisonment
for aggravated cruelty to animals.

The blogger summarizes:

If this incident has accurately been confirmed, why is a county manager
making criminal investigational decisions – is that not the duty of
the Lowndes County Sheriff’s Office?

It has been reported that the AC Officer, who intially filed the
complaint, has now been (mandatorily) transferred to the Lowndes County
Recycling Center.

This situation is starting to reek of that infamous
“good old boy” aroma.

Starting?

The blogger then goes on to list a long series of things that
are plainly against the law that have been alleged to have happened
at the Lowndes County Animal Shelter.

Seems to me the law needs to look into that.
Yet

almost a month now since Jane Osborn asked the sheriff’s office to look into it and apparently nothing has been done.

-jsq