After last night’s Valdosta City Council meeting,
someone told me he thought all renewable energy sources
required subsidies, and that was the problem.
Well, I think the real problem is the much larger
subsidies to big oil.

Dan Froomkin wrote in huffpo

How The Oil Lobby Greases Washington’s Wheels:

Despite astronomical profits during what have been lean years for
most everyone else, the oil and gas industry continues to benefit from
massive, multi-billion dollar taxpayer subsidies. Opinion polling shows
the American public overwhelmingly wants those subsidies eliminated.

That’s at least $4 billion a year to big oil while Congress debates cutting
Social Security and Medicare and maybe shutting down the government.
According to the American Petroleum Institute (API),

after adding in the cost of some other proposed measures (including
reinstating Superfund taxes and repealing two accounting gimmicks that
would affect other industries as well), concluded that Obama’s FY 2012
proposed budget could cost the oil and gas industry

$90 billion over the next decade.

So according to the oil industry’s own pressure group,
we’re subsidizing big oil to the tune of an average of $9 billion a year.
This while BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobil, and Shell
together made $1 trillion in profit (not gross: profit!) in
the last decade, for an average of $100 billion a year in profits,
“with ExxonMobil clearing $31 billion in profits this past year alone.”

And no, they don’t need tax breaks to get them to drill.
Not even former oilman George W. Bush bought that hockum:

“I will tell you with $55 [a barrel] oil we don’t need incentives to
oil and gas companies to explore. There are plenty of incentives.”

And that was back in 2005. Oil prices are around $100 a barrel now.

And we haven’t even added in subisidies to big coal;
for that see Clean Technica.

Eliminate subsidies to big oil and give a fraction of that to solar
and wind, and we’ll see real clean energy take off.

-jsq