
Jane Osborn pointed us at
a detailed list of T-SPLOST projects.
T-SPLOST regional executive committee chairman
Ashley Paulk

gave his opinion on T-SPLOST at a Lowndes County Democratic Party
(LCDP) meeting a few months ago:
He’s against it
because he doesn’t like
a law with a stick in it.
At the same LCDP meeting, Corey Hull of VLMPO explained T-SPLOST,
which LAKE videoed in six parts,
-

T-SPLOST Explained -
T-SPLOST Business plan -
T-SPLOST Project Lists - T-SPLOST Penalties and LMIG
- T-SPLOST Projects to GDOT
- T-SPLOST referendum in 2012
Before that, Corey Hull explained T-SPLOST to VLCIA,

and got
a very interesting question about penalties from Norman Bennett.
VLMPO held
an extended public participation period for T-SPLOST in May.
Maybe some of you who went can report back on that.
-jsq
For whatever it is worth, I do not know of any local elected officials that support the T-SPLOST in its’ current form. Chairman Paulk is right on target with his comments.