{"id":5099,"date":"2013-08-11T22:34:45","date_gmt":"2013-08-12T02:34:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/?p=5099"},"modified":"2013-08-11T22:38:05","modified_gmt":"2013-08-12T02:38:05","slug":"little-guys-must-stick-to-the-letter-of-the-uldc-glpc-2013-07-29","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2013\/08\/little-guys-must-stick-to-the-letter-of-the-uldc-glpc-2013-07-29.html","title":{"rendered":"Little guys must stick to the letter of the ULDC @ GLPC 2013-07-29"},"content":{"rendered":"

\r\nAn individual with a request about family land\r\ngot told by staff he didn’t fit the letter of the zoning code,\r\n\r\n<\/a>\r\nin sharp contrast to the\r\n\r\nMoody Housing item<\/a>\r\nwhich got to slide on traffic, safety, use of local contractors,\r\nand vague affirmations from the developer that maybe there’d\r\nbe no mold or unpaid subcontractors this time.\r\n\r\n\"Walkout\"<\/a>\r\nMost of the attendees didn’t care, and walked out as soon\r\nas this item started.\r\nBut some of the Commissioners did care.\r\n<\/p>\r\n

\r\n\r\nCounty Planner Jason Davenport<\/a> said nobody is currently renting\r\nthe property and “you have the recommendation from staff”.\r\n

\r\n\r\n\"Stubbs\"<\/a>\r\nThe applicant said the land had been deeded by grandmother\r\nto family members years ago,\r\nand one now wanted to sell his part.\r\nThe\r\n\r\nTRC’s analysis<\/a>\r\nsaid the request didn’t meet ULDC requirements and\r\nthe\r\n\r\nTRC’s recommendation<\/a> was laconic:\r\n

\r\n

\r\n3) REZ-2013-10 Stubbs, 4794 Stubbs Lane, 0069 063, 1.19 ac., 1 lot, E-A to R-1, well\/septic\r\n

\r\na) The TRC recommended denial of the request unanimously.\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n

\r\nCommissioner Celine Gladwin asked how big the parcel applicant’s\r\ncousin got. One acre.\r\nAnother Commissioner asked if purchase of additional land was not an option.\r\nNope.\r\nGladwin wondered if the adjoining owners would be interested\r\nin buying applicant’s property.\r\nHe said he’d just as soon give it to them, since they were relatives.\r\n

\r\nHere’s\r\n\r\nPart 1 of 4:<\/a>\r\n<\/p>\r\n

\r\n