{"id":49,"date":"2013-03-06T13:39:43","date_gmt":"2013-03-06T18:39:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2013\/03\/down-and-low-nrc-reactor-status-6-march-2013.html"},"modified":"2013-03-06T13:39:43","modified_gmt":"2013-03-06T18:39:43","slug":"down-and-low-nrc-reactor-status-6-march-2013","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2013\/03\/down-and-low-nrc-reactor-status-6-march-2013.html","title":{"rendered":"Down and Low NRC Reactor Status 6 March 2013"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
104<\/td>\n100%<\/td>\ntotal<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\n3%<\/td>\nnewdown<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\n16%<\/td>\nnewlow<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\n5%<\/td>\nnewtop<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\n15%<\/td>\ndown<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32<\/td>\n30%<\/td>\nlow<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
72<\/td>\n69%<\/td>\ntop<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Since the last time I reported on NRC nuclear reactor statuses,
\n
\n23 February 2013<\/a>,
\nsix are back up, four are newly down (total of sixteen down),
\nseventeen are newly running low (thirty two low).
\nThat’s 30% below 100% power,
\nand only 69% (72 out of 104) running at full power.
\nAnd that’s not counting Vogtle 3 and 4, which Georgia Power
\ncustomers are paying for while never getting any power from them.
\nThis still doesn’t look like the 24\/7 nuclear power we were promised,
\nand
\n
\nit’s not too cheap to meter, either.<\/a>
\nMeanwhile,
\nsolar is already at grid parity without subsidies<\/a>
\nin India and Italy and will be soon in the rest of the world.\n<\/p>\n

Newly down since 23 Feb 2013 on 6 March 2013<\/H2><\/p>\n

\n
\n\"Newly<\/a>
\n
\nNewly down since 23 Feb 2013 on 6 March 2013:
\nFitzPatrick,
\nIndian Point 3,
\nBrunswick 2,
\nMonticello.\n<\/p>\n

Newly low since 23 Feb 2013 on 6 March 2013<\/H2><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n\"Newly<\/a>
\n
\nNewly low since 23 Feb 2013 on 6 March 2013:
\nFitzPatrick,
\nIndian Point 3,
\nLimerick 2,
\nOyster Creek,
\nPilgrim 1,
\nVermont Yankee,
\nBrowns Ferry 2,
\nBrunswick 2,
\nHarris 1,
\nMcGuire 1,
\nVogtle 2,
\nClinton,
\nLa Salle 2,
\nMonticello,
\nPerry 1,
\nQuad Cities 1,
\nArkansas Nuclear 1.\n<\/p>\n

Down on 6 March 2013<\/H2><\/p>\n

\n
\n\"Down<\/a>
\n
\nDown on 6 March 2013:
\nCalvert Cliffs 2,
\nFitzPatrick,
\nIndian Point 3,
\nBrunswick 2,
\nCrystal River 3,
\nHatch 2,
\nTurkey Point 3,
\nTurkey Point 4,
\nMonticello,
\nDiablo Canyon 2,
\nFort Calhoun,
\nRiver Bend 1,
\nSan Onofre 2,
\nSan Onofre 3,
\nSouth Texas 2,
\nWolf Creek 1.\n<\/p>\n

Low on 6 March 2013<\/H2><\/p>\n

\n
\n\"Low<\/a>
\n
\nLow on 6 March 2013:
\nCalvert Cliffs 2,
\nFitzPatrick,
\nIndian Point 3,
\nLimerick 2,
\nOyster Creek,
\nPilgrim 1,
\nSusquehanna 1,
\nSusquehanna 2,
\nVermont Yankee,
\nBrowns Ferry 2,
\nBrunswick 2,
\nCrystal River 3,
\nHarris 1,
\nHatch 2,
\nMcGuire 1,
\nTurkey Point 3,
\nTurkey Point 4,
\nVogtle 2,
\nClinton,
\nFermi 2,
\nLa Salle 2,
\nMonticello,
\nPerry 1,
\nQuad Cities 1,
\nArkansas Nuclear 1,
\nDiablo Canyon 2,
\nFort Calhoun,
\nRiver Bend 1,
\nSan Onofre 2,
\nSan Onofre 3,
\nSouth Texas 2,
\nWolf Creek 1,\n<\/p>\n

Newly up 6 March 2013<\/H2>
\nTo be fair, six reactors have come back up to 100%.<\/p>\n

\n
\n<\/a>
\n
\nNewly 100% on 6 March 2013:
\nBeaver Valley 1,
\nBrowns Ferry 3,
\nHatch 1,
\nSequoyah 2,
\nDuane Arnold,
\nPalo Verde 2.\n<\/p>\n

\n-jsq<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

104 100% total 4 3% newdown 17 16% newlow 6 5% newtop 16 15% down 32 30% low 72 69% top Since the last time I reported on NRC nuclear reactor statuses, 23 February 2013, six are back up, four are newly down (total of sixteen down), seventeen are newly running low (thirty two low). […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,104,3],"tags":[346,363,353,354,358,347,8701,355,348,359,8702,349,12,7,356,360,117,8737,350,361,351,362,8700,6,352,357],"class_list":["post-49","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economy","category-nuclear","category-transparency","tag-6-march-2013","tag-arkansas-nuclear-1","tag-browns-ferry-2","tag-brunswick-2","tag-clinton","tag-fitzpatrick","tag-georgia","tag-harris-1","tag-indian-point-3","tag-la-salle-2","tag-lake","tag-limerick-2","tag-lowndes-area-knowledge-exchange","tag-lowndes-county","tag-mcguire-1","tag-monticello","tag-nrc","tag-nuclear","tag-oyster-creek","tag-perry-1","tag-pilgrim-1","tag-quad-cities-1","tag-transparency","tag-valdosta","tag-vermont-yankee","tag-vogtle-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}