{"id":46,"date":"2013-03-08T19:54:03","date_gmt":"2013-03-09T00:54:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2013\/03\/sc-edison-knew-san-onofre-nuke-steam-generators-were-flawed-before-installation.html"},"modified":"2013-03-08T19:54:03","modified_gmt":"2013-03-09T00:54:03","slug":"sc-edison-knew-san-onofre-nuke-steam-generators-were-flawed-before-installation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2013\/03\/sc-edison-knew-san-onofre-nuke-steam-generators-were-flawed-before-installation.html","title":{"rendered":"SC Edison knew San Onofre nuke steam generators were flawed before installation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\nSouthern California Edison knew the new steam generators<br \/>\nwere defective years before then even installed them in<br \/>\nthe San Onofre nuclear reactors,<br \/>\nacccording to a report just released. These are the generators<br \/>\n<a href=\"\/blog\/2013\/01\/san-onofre-and-diablo-canyon-status-graphs-nrc-data.html\"><br \/>\nthat failed and caused both San Onofre reactors to shut down<\/a>.<br \/>\nSD Edison wants to <a href=\"\/blog\/2013\/01\/shutdown-at-san-onofre-permanent-this-time.html\">restart one of them<\/a>,<br \/>\nand this document came out in that process.<br \/>\nSouthern Company would never do this, right?<br \/>\nWe shouldn&#8217;t worry about<br \/>\n<a href=\"\/blog\/2013\/01\/failed-concrete-the-bane-of-nuclear-reactors-1.html\"><br \/>\nfailed concrete<\/a><br \/>\nor<br \/>\n<a href=\"\/blog\/2013\/03\/from-15-to-19-months-late-plant-vogtle-nukes.html\"><br \/>\n15, no now 19, months delay<\/a><br \/>\nwhile the Georgia legislature<br \/>\n<a href=\"\/blog\/2013\/03\/hb-267-would-limit-georgia-powers-profits-on-vogtles-cost-overruns-ga-sierra-club.html\"><br \/>\nwon&#8217;t even limit charges to Georgia Power customers for cost overruns.<\/a><br \/>\nNope, no worries.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nFriends of the Earth PR 8 March 2013,<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/newswire\/2013\/03\/08-6\"><br \/>\nSan Onofre: Secret Report Confirms Edison Knew of Major Problems;<br \/>\nFriends of the Earth: \u2018Bombshell\u2019 for plans to restart crippled reactor<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/latimesblogs.latimes.com\/lanow\/2013\/03\/officials-rejected-some-changes-to-crippled-nuclear-generators.html\"><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:right;border:none;\" class=\"at-xid-6a0120a58214e4970b017d41a0884a970c\" src=\"\/blog\/images\/6a0120a58214e4970b017d41a0884a970c-pi.jpg\"   width=\"320\" height=\"211\"  \/><\/a><br \/>\nWASHINGTON\u2014March 8\u2014A secret Mitsubishi Heavy Industries<br \/>\nreport released today confirms that Southern California Edison knew<br \/>\nabout serious problems in the radically redesigned replacement steam<br \/>\ngenerators for the San Onofre nuclear reactors years before the<br \/>\ndefective equipment was installed, yet failed to make changes to fix<br \/>\nthe problems. The report was released today by the Nuclear<br \/>\nRegulatory Commission after Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and<br \/>\nRepresentative Edward Markey (D-Mass.) revealed its existence and<br \/>\ndemanded it be made public.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nThe report documents that Edison knew\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nof specific safety concerns<br \/>\nwith the replacement steam generator design as early as 2005, and<br \/>\nfailed to incorporate changes proposed to fix it because they would<br \/>\ntrigger a more lengthy and public review by the NRC. It fatally<br \/>\nundermines Edison&#8217;s case for restarting one of the plant&#8217;s crippled<br \/>\nreactors and for receiving any compensation from the California<br \/>\nPublic Utility Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\u201cThis is a bombshell,\u201d said Damon Moglen, energy and<br \/>\nclimate director for Friends of the Earth. \u201cEdison clearly<br \/>\nknew about design problems with the San Onofre replacement steam<br \/>\ngenerators yet failed to take corrective action. Instead Edison<br \/>\ngambled with the safety of millions of Southern Californians. It is<br \/>\ninconceivable that the NRC would now give approval to restart these<br \/>\ndamaged reactors without the thorough, public review of a license<br \/>\namendment proceeding.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<a href=\"\/blog\/2013\/01\/san-onofre-and-diablo-canyon-status-graphs-nrc-data.html\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:right;border:none;\"   src=\"http:\/\/farm9.staticflickr.com\/8514\/8429494725_a38215b6f9_n.jpg\"><\/a><br \/>\nDavid Freeman, former head of the Los Angeles Department of Water<br \/>\nand Power and a senior advisor to Friends of the Earth, said the<br \/>\nMitsubishi report could prove pivotal with the California Public<br \/>\nUtility Commission, which is considering whether Edison can pass on<br \/>\nto its customers the $671 million cost of the faulty generators,<br \/>\nplus the cost of repairs and replacement power during the plant&#8217;s<br \/>\nshutdown, now in its 14th month. Said Freeman: \u201cIt&#8217;s clear<br \/>\nthat ratepayers in Southern California can not be expected to pay<br \/>\nfor Edison&#8217;s defective equipment if Edison acted imprudently. At<br \/>\nnuclear reactors, prioritizing construction speed over safety is the<br \/>\nheight of imprudence.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\nSince Sen. Boxer and Rep. Markey revealed the existence of the<br \/>\nreport, Friends of the Earth has demanded that the NRC Petition<br \/>\nReview Board consider it in proceedings currently underway. The<br \/>\nPetition Review Board, in response to a petition from Friends of the<br \/>\nEarth, is determining whether Edison improperly failed to apply for<br \/>\na license amendment before installing replacement steam generators<br \/>\nof a radically different design than was permitted under the<br \/>\nreactors&#8217; operating license.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nNuclear engineers Arnie Gunderson of Burlington, Vt., and John Large<br \/>\nof London, consultants to Friends of the Earth, are reviewing the<br \/>\nMitsubishi report and will provide expert analysis.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/libcloud.s3.amazonaws.com\/93\/92\/5\/2795\/MHI_Root_Cause.pdf\"><br \/>\nClick here for the MHI document.<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fairewinds.org\/sites\/fairewinds.org\/files\/reports\/2013-1-16_foe_2-206_fairewinds_presentation_sano.pdf\"><br \/>\nClick here for the Friends of the Earth Petitions case.<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n###\n<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.foe.org\/\"><br \/>\nFriends of the Earth<\/a> is the U.S. voice of the world&#8217;s largest grassroots environmental network, with member groups in 77 countries. Since 1969, Friends of the Earth has fought to create a more healthy, just world.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\n-jsq<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Southern California Edison knew the new steam generators were defective years before then even installed them in the San Onofre nuclear reactors, acccording to a report just released. These are the generators that failed and caused both San Onofre reactors to shut down. SD Edison wants to restart one of them, and this document came [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[97,14,70,8,18,2,20,104,21,22,3],"tags":[8736,337,339,8704,338,8728,336,341,8701,8708,8699,8702,8710,12,117,8737,118,8711,107,8712,314,8766,335,108,340,8700],"class_list":["post-46","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-activism","category-economy","category-ethics","category-georgia","category-georgia-power","category-government","category-law","category-nuclear","category-planning","category-politics","category-transparency","tag-activism","tag-barbara-boxer","tag-california","tag-economy","tag-edward-markey","tag-ethics","tag-friends-of-the-earth","tag-generator","tag-georgia","tag-georgia-power","tag-government","tag-lake","tag-law","tag-lowndes-area-knowledge-exchange","tag-nrc","tag-nuclear","tag-nuclear-regulatory-commission","tag-planning","tag-plant-vogtle","tag-politics","tag-reactor","tag-san-onofre","tag-southern-california-edison","tag-southern-company","tag-steam","tag-transparency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}