{"id":2819,"date":"2013-04-03T09:41:22","date_gmt":"2013-04-03T13:41:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/?p=2819"},"modified":"2013-04-03T09:45:14","modified_gmt":"2013-04-03T13:45:14","slug":"utilities-levy-an-absurd-tax-upon-the-rest-of-their-fellow-citizens-mdashadam-smith","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2013\/04\/utilities-levy-an-absurd-tax-upon-the-rest-of-their-fellow-citizens-mdashadam-smith.html","title":{"rendered":"Utilities levy an absurd tax upon the rest of their fellow-citizens &#8211;Adam Smith"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\r\nWhat&#8217;s next door to Georgia Power, also a Southern Company,\r\nand raising rates on customers who are using less electricity?\r\nAlabama Power.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nRebecca Smith wrote for WSJ 21 March 2013,\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424127887324373204578374432165174290.html\">\r\nReturn Rates for Utilities Get Harder Look<\/a>\r\n<\/p>\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424127887324373204578374432165174290.html\">\r\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" align=\"right\" border=0 width=\"277\" height=\"152\"\r\n src=\"http:\/\/si.wsj.net\/public\/resources\/images\/MK-CB807_UTILIT_G_20130321182407.jpg\"><\/a>\r\n<blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nHouseholds getting electricity from Alabama Power Co. are using 6%\r\nless than five years ago. But their monthly power bills still have\r\nincreased by an average of 8%, partly because of a lucrative rate\r\nagreement that the utility brokered with state regulators 30 years\r\nago.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<blockquote style=\"float:right;font-size:120%;width:30%\">\r\n&#8220;an absurd tax upon the rest of their fellow-citizens&#8221;\r\n<br>\r\n&mdash;Adam Smith\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nThe deal allows Alabama Power, the state&#8217;s largest electric utility,\r\nto adjust its rates annually to maintain a return on equity, a\r\nmeasure of profit, of 13% to 14.5%. Now it is coming under fire from\r\nconsumer advocates and one state utility commissioner, who argue\r\nthat the utility&#8217;s profit levels are too high.\r\n<\/p><!--more-->\r\n<p>\r\nSimilar disputes are breaking out across the U.S., as regulators\r\ntake a harder look at utility profits, given low interest rates that\r\nhave changed the cost of financing power plants. Regulators\r\ntypically set an upper limit on profits because utilities function\r\nas monopolies and regulators fear that they otherwise might gouge\r\ncaptive customers.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nShocked, shocked to hear monopolies might gouge customers!\r\nBut Adam Smith wouldn&#8217;t be shocked:\r\n<\/p>\r\n<blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\n&#8220;The interest of the dealers, however, in any particular branch of\r\ntrade or manufactures, is always in some respects different from,\r\nand even opposite to, that of the public. To widen the market and to\r\nnarrow the competition, is always the interest of the dealers. To\r\nwiden the market may frequently be agreeable enough to the interest\r\nof the public; but to narrow the competition must always be against\r\nit, and can serve only to enable the dealers, by raising their\r\nprofits above what they naturally would be, to levy, for their own\r\nbenefit, an absurd tax upon the rest of their fellow-citizens. The\r\nproposal of any new law or regulation of commerce which comes from\r\nthis order ought always to be listened to with great precaution, and\r\nought never to be adopted till after having been long and carefully\r\nexamined, not only with the most scrupulous, but with the most\r\nsuspicious attention. It comes from an order of men whose interest\r\nis never exactly the same with that of the public, who have\r\ngenerally an interest to deceive and even to oppress the public, and\r\nwho accordingly have, upon many occasions, both deceived and\r\noppressed it.&#8221;\r\n<\/p>\r\n&mdash;Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations, 1776\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nThe \r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424127887324373204578374432165174290.html\">\r\nWSJ Journal article<\/a> continues:\r\n<\/p>\r\n<blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nIn 92 major rate decisions last year, regulators, on average,\r\ngranted gas and electric utilities returns of 10%, compared with\r\n10.21% the prior year and 11% a decade ago, according to research\r\nand consulting firm Regulatory Research Associates.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\n&#8220;Only&#8221; 10% profit and utilities are complaining about it,\r\nas the rest of the article describes.\r\nWhat benefits do utility customers derive from these utility profits?\r\n<\/p>\r\n<blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nDavid Schlissel, an economist at the Institute for Energy Economics\r\n&#038; Financial Analysis in Boston, examined Alabama Power&#8217;s finances\r\nfor a state consumer group and concluded the current rate formula\r\nhas benefitted shareholders more than consumers.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nOh.\r\nBut even that is not the whole story,\r\nbecause Alabama Power&#8217;s stock dividend yield is only 5.35%\r\nand Southern Company&#8217;s is only 4.19%.\r\nYou can get 5.55% from Georgia Power preferred stock, but that&#8217;s\r\nstill nowhere near 10% or 14.5%.\r\nWhere does the difference go?\r\nWell, according to Alabama Power&#8217;s\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.alabamapower.com\/about-us\/pdf\/290302_002_BMK.pdf\">\r\nNOTICE OF 2013\r\nANNUAL MEETING\r\n&#038; INFORMATION STATEMENT<\/a>,\r\nits eleven\r\nDirectors get $40-45,000 cash a year plus $30,000 in SO stock and\r\n$1,800 for each Board meeting attended, plus $1,200 for each Board Committee\r\nor other Board business-related meeting.\r\nThere&#8217;s a handy table on page 7 of how much each director has been paid.\r\nThey don&#8217;t add it up, but the total is probably less than a million dollars.\r\nSo where&#8217;s the real money going?\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nOn page 29 there&#8217;s another table, of executive pay,\r\nstarting with Alabama Power CEO  C.D. McCrary at $777,167 salary,\r\n$3,054,840 Stock Awards, $703,232 Option Awards, $1,028,204\r\nNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation,\r\n$2,437,448 Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation\r\nEarnings,\r\n$44,722 All Other Compensation, for a total of\r\n$8,045,613 for 2012.\r\nWhich is up 50% from 2011.\r\nPlus the other executives and their raises.\r\nPlus the executives of Southern Company and their raises.\r\nAnd let&#8217;s not forget the investment banks floating bonds.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nAlabama Power customers, if you have had enough spare cash left\r\nto buy some\r\nstock and you did so by March 13<small><sup>th<\/sup><\/small>,\r\nyou can go ask about all this at the annual shareholders meeting on\r\nApril 26<small><sup>th<\/sup><\/small> in Birmingham.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\n-jsq\r\n<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"What&#8217;s next door to Georgia Power, also a Southern Company, and raising rates on customers who are using less electricity? Alabama Power. Rebecca Smith wrote for WSJ 21 March 2013, Return Rates for Utilities Get Harder Look Households getting electricity from Alabama Power Co. are using 6% less than five years ago. But their monthly [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[14,18,2],"tags":[8759,6068,6070,6069,8704,8701,8708,3392,8699,8702,12,7,6071,384,4979,1128,108,2532,6],"class_list":["post-2819","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economy","category-georgia-power","category-government","tag-alabama","tag-alabama-power","tag-c-d-mccrary","tag-dividends","tag-economy","tag-georgia","tag-georgia-power","tag-gouging","tag-government","tag-lake","tag-lowndes-area-knowledge-exchange","tag-lowndes-county","tag-preferred","tag-rates","tag-salaries","tag-shareholder","tag-southern-company","tag-stock","tag-valdosta"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p585fK-Jt","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2819","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2819"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2819\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2822,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2819\/revisions\/2822"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2819"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2819"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2819"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}