{"id":2088,"date":"2011-05-04T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-04T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2011\/05\/a-real-national-strategy-jim-dwyer.html"},"modified":"2011-05-04T08:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-05-04T12:00:00","slug":"a-real-national-strategy-jim-dwyer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2011\/05\/a-real-national-strategy-jim-dwyer.html","title":{"rendered":"A real national strategy &mdash;Jim Dwyer"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/05\/04\/nyregion\/a-strategy-for-national-security-focused-on-sustainability.html\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:right;border:none;\"   src=\"http:\/\/graphics8.nytimes.com\/images\/2011\/05\/04\/nyregion\/ABOUT1\/ABOUT1-articleInline.jpg\"><\/a><br \/>\nWhat say we make a real national security strategy,<br \/>\none based on energy independence and a sustainable economy?<\/p>\n<p>\nJim Dwyer write 3 May 2011 in the NY Times,<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/05\/03\/sports\/football\/03duerson.html\"><br \/>\nA National Security Strategy That Doesn\u2019t Focus on Threats<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n&#8220;Poorly fitted air conditioners cost New York City 130 to 180 million<br \/>\ndollars a year in extra energy consumption,&#8221; one of the strategists,<br \/>\nCapt. Wayne Porter of the Navy, said Tuesday. &#8220;They generate 370,525<br \/>\nextra tons of carbon dioxide.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>\nSuppose, he says, you fixed them. And then you got the 40 states<br \/>\nthat waste the most electricity to match the 10 most efficient. The<br \/>\nlikely benefits are no surprise \u2014 less foreign oil, cost savings,<br \/>\njob creation, decreased pollution.<\/p>\n<p>\nNow follow that thread to<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.wilsoncenter.org\/events\/docs\/A%20National%20Strategic%20Narrative.pdf\"><br \/>\n&#8220;A National Strategic Narrative,&#8221;<\/a><br \/>\na paper<br \/>\nwritten by Captain Porter and Col. Mark Mykleby of the Marines, which<br \/>\ncalls on the United States to see that it cannot continue to engage the<br \/>\nworld primarily with military force, but must do so as a nation powered<br \/>\nby the strength of its educational system, social policies, international<br \/>\ndevelopment and diplomacy, and its commitment to sustainable practices<br \/>\nin energy and agriculture.<\/p>\n<p>\n&#8220;We must recognize that security means more than defense,&#8221; they<br \/>\nwrite. After ending the 20th century as the world\u2019s most powerful<br \/>\ncountry, &#8220;we failed to recognize that dominance, like fossil fuel,<br \/>\nis not a sustainable form of energy.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>\nAn army without an economy defends nothing.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>\nA sustainable economy doesn&#8217;t need much of an army.<\/p>\n<p>\nSure, everybody is talking about the demise of Osama bin Laden.<br \/>\nBut remember:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n&#8220;When Saddam Hussein was discovered in his spider hole, everyone<br \/>\nthought, &#8216;Hallelujah, the war is over,&#8217; and it was really just<br \/>\nbeginning,&#8221; Colonel Mykleby said Tuesday by phone from his home in<br \/>\nSouth Carolina. &#8220;The big, bad daddies, taking them out \u2014 it&#8217;s not<br \/>\nthe answer. It\u2019s part of it. The job is not done yet. There are still<br \/>\nbad guys are out there, and it\u2019s going to be part of the fabric of our<br \/>\nworld. This is a critical moment to talk about a narrative that isn\u2019t<br \/>\njust focused on threats.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>\nIn their paper, the officers argue that the United States has to move<br \/>\nfrom &#8220;containment&#8221; \u2014 the foreign policy established after World<br \/>\nWar II to limit the expansion and influence of the Soviet Union \u2014 to<br \/>\nwhat they call &#8220;sustainment&#8221; or sustainability.<\/p>\n<p>\nThe first priority, they write, should be &#8220;intellectual capital and<br \/>\na sustainable infrastructure of education, health and social services<br \/>\nto provide for the continuing development and growth of America&#8217;s<br \/>\nyouth.&#8221; They go on to say that the country&#8217;s security may require<br \/>\n&#8220;a hard look at the distribution of our treasure,&#8221; arguing that the<br \/>\nhistoric focus on defense and protectionism has meant the neglect of<br \/>\ninternational development and diplomacy. And with technology piercing<br \/>\nthe isolation of nations, they write that the United States has a stake<br \/>\nin helping countries held down by illiteracy and poverty.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Want to decrease worldwide exploitation of resources and pollution?<br \/>\nIncrease literacy and decrease poverty.<br \/>\nMany studies show that&#8217;s the path to lower population<br \/>\nand less resource use.<\/p>\n<p>\nGlobal security begins at home,<br \/>\nwith education and a sustainable economy.<br \/>\nWe already know how to deploy solar and wind energy.<br \/>\nLet&#8217;s get on with it.<\/p>\n<p>\n-jsq<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What say we make a real national security strategy, one based on energy independence and a sustainable economy? Jim Dwyer write 3 May 2011 in the NY Times, A National Security Strategy That Doesn\u2019t Focus on Threats &#8220;Poorly fitted air conditioners cost New York City 130 to 180 million dollars a year in extra energy [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[97,14,15,264,265,16,41,570,21,22,32,23,73,24,36],"tags":[931,1031,8731,8714,1714,4614,2117,8716],"class_list":["post-2088","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-activism","category-economy","category-education","category-energy-conservation","category-energy-efficiency","category-environment","category-health-care","category-military","category-planning","category-politics","category-pollution","category-renewable-energy","category-safety","category-solar","category-wind","tag-conservation","tag-efficiency","tag-safety","tag-solar","tag-strategy","tag-strength","tag-sustainable","tag-wind"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2088","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2088"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2088\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2088"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2088"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2088"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}