{"id":2046,"date":"2011-05-11T11:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-11T15:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2011\/05\/put-there-for-us-to-use-barbara-herring.html"},"modified":"2011-05-11T11:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-05-11T15:00:00","slug":"put-there-for-us-to-use-barbara-herring","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2011\/05\/put-there-for-us-to-use-barbara-herring.html","title":{"rendered":"Put there for us to use —Barbara Herring"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/a>\nShould developers drive the extension of county services,\nor should there be a planning process that takes other factors into account?\nThe Glen Laurel rezoning case suggests that developers drive the process now.\n

\nSpeaking for the Glen Laurel subdivision were\nBill Nijem and Barbara Herring.\nShe described the original layout as “a very efficient layout”.\nShe said they redesigned it and added a park in the middle\nand other green space in addition to natural vegetation.\n

\nAll the neighbors on the outside wouldn’t be able to see into it very well.\n<\/blockquote>\nShe said they also increased the lot sizes,\nbut they did not change the road plan.\n

\nHere’s\n\nPart 1 of 2:<\/a>\n\n\n

\n