{"id":16324,"date":"2016-04-18T13:59:08","date_gmt":"2016-04-18T17:59:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/?p=16324"},"modified":"2016-04-18T13:59:08","modified_gmt":"2016-04-18T17:59:08","slug":"southern-company-annual-meeting-so-2016-05-25","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2016\/04\/southern-company-annual-meeting-so-2016-05-25.html","title":{"rendered":"Southern Company Annual Meeting @ SO 2016-05-25"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\r\nRoad trip to Callaway Gardens for the annual question time with Tom Fanning,\r\nquestions provided by environmentalists and Southern Company (SO) stockholders from at least four states.\r\n<p>\r\n<a title=\"Energy Mix\" href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/?attachment_id=16331\">\r\n<img decoding=\"async\" style=\"border:none;width:300px;float:right\" width=\"300\" alt=\"Energy Mix\" src=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/be6ecc469a02f857d4751c6cd29f4723.jpg\"><\/a>\r\n\r\nThis figure from page ii of the meeting Notice illustrates both the problem and the solution for Southern Company.\r\nNatural gas has replaced coal as SO&#8217;s top energy source, and Nuclear is still \r\nin there.\r\nBut renewables are up to 4%.\r\nAnd over on the right of the same page:\r\n<blockquote>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\nGrowth in Renewables\r\n<br>\r\nApproximately 3,800 megawatts of announced\r\nor added renewable capacity since 2012. This\r\nincludes the development of what is expected to\r\nbe the largest voluntary solar portfolio in the U.S.\r\n(at Georgia Power Company).\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nInteresting use of &#8220;voluntary&#8221;, but never mind that.\r\nIf SO keeps that up, it will<!--more-->\r\n\r\n be more than doubling its solar capacity\r\nevery two years, faster than the national average.\r\nAnd that 4% will in less than ten years become the majority energy source.\r\n<p>\r\nHere are the materials provided for the meeting:<!--more-->\r\n\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/materials.proxyvote.com\/Approved\/842587\/20160328\/NPS_279447.PDF\">\r\nNotice of\r\n2016 Annual Meeting\r\nof Stockholders\r\nand Proxy Statement<\/a>\r\n<li>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/materials.proxyvote.com\/Approved\/842587\/20160328\/AR_279446.PDF\">\r\nSouthern Company 2015 Annual Report<\/a>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>\r\nHere, from where they were hidden on page 88, are the two stockholder proposals the board recommends voting against,\r\non \r\n<a href=\"#IEA2C\">the IEA&#8217;s 2 degree scenario<\/a>\r\nand\r\n<a href=\"#Coal\">on coal as stranded assets<\/a>.\r\nSO didn&#8217;t say for either one who proposed them.\r\n<H3><a name=\"IEA2C\" href=\"#IEA2C\">Item 9<\/a><\/H3>\r\n<blockquote style=\"font-size:100%\">\r\n<p>\r\nREPORT ON STRATEGY FOR INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY 2&deg;C SCENARIO\r\n<H4>\r\nWhereas:\r\n<\/H4>\r\n<p>\r\nThe 2014 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Synthesis\r\nReport warns that global warming will have &ldquo;severe, pervasive\r\nand irreversible impacts for people and ecosystems.&rdquo; The costs\r\nof failing to address climate change are significant and are\r\nestimated to have an average value at risk of $4.2 trillion\r\nglobally. To mitigate the worst impacts of climate change and limit\r\nwarming to below 2 degrees Centigrade (2&deg;C), as agreed in the\r\nCancun Agreement, the IPCC estimates that a fifty percent reduction\r\nin greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally is needed by 2050,\r\nrelative to 1990 levels.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nThe Southern Company has had a proactive response toward the\r\nlow-carbon transition by adding more than 3,600 MW of renewable\r\nprojects since 2012, developing &lsquo;clean coal&rsquo; technology, adding\r\nnuclear energy generation, and making the first offer by a utility\r\nfor investment-grade Green Bonds valued at $1 billion.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nHowever, accelerated efforts are necessary: Southern is the third\r\nlargest Carbon Dioxide (C0 2 ) emitter in the country and ranked\r\n26th out of 32 utility companies for Energy Efficiency Savings in a\r\nbenchmarking report produced by Ceres in 2014.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nRegulatory and technology changes are underway that will profoundly\r\nimpact the utility business model. The U.S. Environmental Protection\r\nAgency (EPA) recently finalized the Clean Power Plan, requiring\r\nstates to achieve 32% GHG reductions on average nationwide (from\r\n2005 levels). Yet the International Energy Agency (lEA) 2&deg;C\r\nScenario requires a 90% reduction of global average carbon intensity\r\nof electricity production by 2050, necessitating significant action\r\nbeyond the Clean Power Plan. Meanwhile, developments in new\r\ntechnologies are leading to sharply declining costs, increasing\r\ncompetitiveness of renewable energy generation and storage.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nRates must be designed for maximum flexibility to achieve climate\r\nobjectives while providing just and universal access to electricity\r\nservices, including affordable services to low-income customers.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nRecognizing the unique constraints on innovation for the low-carbon\r\ntransition in each regulated market, Southern&#8217;s subsidiary companies\r\ncan demonstrate a willingness to work with regulators to develop\r\nframeworks to catalyze the low-carbon transition. In Minnesota,\r\nutilities, rate-payers, and regulators are collaborating to map the\r\ntransition to a regulatory model that enables innovation, customer\r\noptions, and realizes public policy goals.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nProponents offer this supportive but stretching resolution to urge\r\nSouthern to position itself to thrive for the long-term in a\r\ndecarbonized energy sector.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nRESOLVED: Shareholders request that Southern Company issue a report\r\nby November 30, 2016, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary\r\ninformation, on Southern&#8217;s strategy for aligning business operations\r\nwith the IEA 2&deg;C scenario, while maintaining the provision of safe,\r\naffordable, reliable energy.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<H4>\r\nSupporting Statement:\r\n<\/H4>\r\n<p>\r\nProponents believe this report may include:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\nPlans to integrate technological, regulatory, and business\r\nmodel innovations such as: distributed energy resources\r\n(storage and generation), demand response, smart grid\r\ntechnologies, and increased customer energy efficiency, as\r\nwell as corresponding revenue models and rate designs.\r\n<li>\r\nInformation on aligning incentives, research and\r\ndevelopment, public policy positions, engagement strategy\r\nwith state regulators, and board governance with Southern&#8217;s\r\nbusiness plan compatible with this strategy.\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nThe Board&#8217;s Statement of Opposition basically says both they&#8217;re already doing that and they don&#8217;t need to do that.\r\n<H3><a name=\"Coal\" href=\"#Coal\">Item 10<\/a><\/H3>\r\n<blockquote style=\"font-size:100%\">\r\n<p>\r\nREPORT QUANTIFYING POTENTIAL FINANCIAL LOSSES TO THE\r\nCOMPANY ASSOCIATED WITH STRANDING OF COAL ASSETS\r\n<H4>\r\nWhereas:\r\n<\/H4>\r\n<p>\r\nThe Southeast&#8217;s economic growth &ldquo;is at risk from unchecked\r\nclimate change, which could render this region&mdash; already one of\r\nthe hottest and most weather vulnerable of the country&mdash; at\r\nsignificant economic risk.&rdquo; (Risky Business, 2015).\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nBecause coal causes 77% of U.S. energy related emissions,\r\nregulations designed to halt or mitigate climate change will likely\r\ntarget coal. (EPA, Electricity Sector Emissions, 2014). This may\r\nlead to stranding&mdash; premature write downs, or devaluations of\r\ncoal assets. For instance, in 2015, the U.S. finalized the Clean\r\nPower Plan, which requires the electric power sector to\r\nsignificantly reduce carbon emissions. HSBC noted that the rules\r\ncould &ldquo;increase the stranding risk for U.S. coal producers and\r\ncoal heavy utilities.&rdquo; Coal fired utilities claimed that the\r\nregulations will &ldquo;result in billions of dollars in stranded\r\nassets.&rdquo; (Comment to EPA from Coalition for Innovative Climate\r\nSolutions).\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nIn contrast to peers, Southern Company is making big bets on carbon\r\ncapture and storage (&ldquo;CCS&rdquo;) and coal gasification, with\r\nthe hope of trapping carbon pollution and storing it indefinitely,\r\nsimilar to nuclear waste. However, there is tremendous controversy\r\nand conflicting data on whether CCS works, is cost effective, and\r\ncan overcome high water requirements, and other challenges. Coal\r\ngasification attempts to reduce coal&#8217;s carbon intensity by\r\nconverting coal to gas, then burning it. Coal gasification is not\r\nwidely employed because natural gas is a less expensive alternative\r\nthat achieves similar carbon savings. Southern Company&#8217;s Kemper coal\r\ngasification plant is nearly $4 billion dollars over-budget and two\r\nyears delayed, resulting in Southern&#8217;s subsidiary, Mississippi\r\nPower, having its credit downgraded. Mississippi has also not\r\ncommitted to full cost recovery for Kemper, and the state Supreme\r\nCourt refunded Kemper-related costs to customers.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nSouthern&#8217;s emphasis on CCS and coal gasification constitute a gamble\r\nthat may increase, rather than reduce, its carbon asset risk.\r\nSouthern&#8217;s focus on these technologies discourages the Company from\r\nshuttering or converting coal plants, exposing investors to billions\r\nof dollars of risk due to uncertainty about technical viability and\r\ncost effectiveness. Kemper has already resulted in millions of\r\ndollars of losses being born by shareholders.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<H4>THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:<\/H4>\r\n<p>\r\nShareholders request that Southern Company prepare a report by\r\nSeptember 2016, omitting proprietary information and at reasonable\r\ncost, quantifying potential financial losses to the company\r\nassociated with stranding of its coal assets under a range of\r\nscenarios for climate change driven regulations that mandate\r\ngreenhouse gas reductions beyond those required by the Clean Power\r\nPlan. Such report should include possible financial losses if coal\r\ngasification and\/or CCS is rejected by policymakers as a technical\r\nclimate mitigation strategy, or if they cannot be cost effectively\r\nimplemented. Shareholders also request that Southern disclose, in\r\nthe report, its total investments in CCS and coal gasification\r\ntechnologies.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nI&#8217;ll quote this first point from the Board&#8217;s rebuttal:\r\n<blockquote style=\"font-size:100%\">\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>\r\nPreparing a report on the financial impact to\r\nthe Company of regulations that would require\r\nGHG reduction beyond the Clean Power Plan is\r\nimpractical, given the significant uncertainty around\r\nthe content, timing, and stringency of rules that\r\nhave not yet been proposed. Additional uncertainty\r\nresults from the potential impact of future regulatory\r\ndecisions on the Southern Company system&#8217;s\r\nproposed asset retirements and related cost\r\nrecovery. As a result, any conclusions in such a\r\nreport, if prepared, would be so speculative as to be\r\nof little value to investors.\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nSo SO admits it doesn&#8217;t know that Kemper Coal will actually work.\r\nWhat say we call off Kemper Coal and the Plant Vogtle nuke boondoggle\r\nand get on with solar power?\r\n<p>\r\n -jsq\r\n<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Road trip to Callaway Gardens for the annual question time with Tom Fanning, questions provided by environmentalists and Southern Company (SO) stockholders from at least four states. This figure from page ii of the meeting Notice illustrates both the problem and the solution for Southern Company. Natural gas has replaced coal as SO&#8217;s top energy [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[216,264,265,18,6124,104,6687,23,24,36],"tags":[9227,2368,2373,8753,5190,8754,8755,8701,8708,5464,4130,8655,9228,9229,7209,548,8702,12,562,8737,2369,6076,8713,2367,8714,108,6339,8716],"class_list":["post-16324","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-coal","category-energy-conservation","category-energy-efficiency","category-georgia-power","category-natural-gas-2","category-nuclear","category-pipeline-2","category-renewable-energy","category-solar","category-wind","tag-25-may-2016","tag-callaway-gardens","tag-ceo-thomas-a-fanning","tag-coal","tag-emissions","tag-energy-conservation","tag-energy-efficiency","tag-georgia","tag-georgia-power","tag-ghg","tag-greenhouse-gas","tag-iea","tag-intergovernmental-panel-on-climate-change","tag-international-energy-agency","tag-ipcc","tag-john-s-quarterman","tag-lake","tag-lowndes-area-knowledge-exchange","tag-natural-gas","tag-nuclear","tag-pine-mountain","tag-pipeline","tag-renewable-energy","tag-shareholder-meeting","tag-solar","tag-southern-company","tag-tom-fanning","tag-wind"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p585fK-4fi","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16324","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16324"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16324\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16336,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16324\/revisions\/16336"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16324"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16324"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}