{"id":1309,"date":"2011-11-06T11:40:01","date_gmt":"2011-11-06T16:40:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2011\/11\/tracking-can-help-all-distributions-of-students-new-research.html"},"modified":"2011-11-06T11:40:01","modified_gmt":"2011-11-06T16:40:01","slug":"tracking-can-help-all-distributions-of-students-new-research","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2011\/11\/tracking-can-help-all-distributions-of-students-new-research.html","title":{"rendered":"Tracking can help all distributions of students &mdash;new research"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It turns out tracking students can help all students if done properly.<br \/>\nCUEE&#8217;s<br \/>\n<a href=\"\/blog\/2011\/09\/cuee-demolishes-its-own-case.html\"><br \/>\ninvited speaker Terry Jenkins<\/a><br \/>\nco-authored a paper<br \/>\nback in 1997 about <a href=\"\/blog\/2011\/09\/detracking-troup-county-according-to-terry-jenkins.html\"><br \/>\nDetracking Troup County: Providing an Exemplary Curriculum for All Students.<\/a><br \/>\nHe appeared to be saying de-tracking was an advantge of school consolidation.<br \/>\nBack then tracking was apparently considered a bad thing.<br \/>\nRecent research shows that actually tracking students can help all<br \/>\nlevels of students.<br \/>\nSo yet another supposed reason or benefit of consolidation turns out<br \/>\nnot to be true.<\/p>\n<p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/econ-www.mit.edu\/faculty\/eduflo\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:right;border:none;\"   src=\"http:\/\/econ-www.mit.edu\/timages\/15\"><\/a><br \/>\nEsther Duflo, Pascaline Dupas, and Michael Kremer wrote for American Economic Review, 101(5): 1739\u201374, DOI:10.1257\/aer.101.5.1739,<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.aeaweb.org\/articles.php?doi=10.1257\/aer.101.5.1739\"><br \/>\nPeer Effects, Teacher Incentives, and the Impact of Tracking: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nTo the extent that students benefit from high-achieving peers, tracking<br \/>\nwill help strong students and hurt weak ones. However, all students may<br \/>\nbenefit if tracking allows teachers to better tailor their instruction<br \/>\nlevel. Lower-achieving pupils are particularly likely to benefit from<br \/>\ntracking when teachers have incentives to teach to the top of the<br \/>\ndistribution. We propose a simple model nesting these effects and test<br \/>\nits implications in a randomized tracking experiment conducted with<br \/>\n121 primary schools in Kenya. While the direct effect of high-achieving<br \/>\npeers is positive, tracking benefited lower-achieving pupils indirectly<br \/>\nby allowing teachers to teach to their level. (JEL I21, J45, O15)\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The first sentence is the standard &#8220;diversity&#8221; argument that CUEE<br \/>\nkeeps making.<br \/>\nThe authors state it so as to poing out that their study finds<br \/>\nthat it&#8217;s far from the whole story.<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/98706376@N00\/6318453245\/in\/photostream\/\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" style=\"border:none;\"   src=\"http:\/\/farm7.static.flickr.com\/6097\/6318453245_96061af78b.jpg\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>\nI find this part especially interesting:<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nLower-achieving pupils are particularly likely to benefit from<br \/>\ntracking when teachers have incentives to teach to the top of the<br \/>\ndistribution.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That appears to mean that teachers don&#8217;t even need direct incentives<br \/>\nto teach to the rest of the distribution; merely focusing on one<br \/>\npart of the distribution also frees teachers to to focus on other<br \/>\nparts of the distribution.<br \/>\nAnd then imagine what if teachers also had incentives to focus<br \/>\non the lower-achieving pupils?<\/p>\n<p>\nHere&#8217;s a<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nber.org\/papers\/w14475\"><br \/>\nslightly earlier version of the paper<\/a><br \/>\nthat doesn&#8217;t require signing up to get it.<\/p>\n<p>\nIt appears to me that the Chamber and CUEE have<br \/>\n<a href=\"\/blog\/2011\/11\/all-about-school-consolidation.html\"><br \/>\nno arguments left for school consolidation.<\/a><br \/>\nI agree with FVCS and Nimrod and both school systems and the Valdosta City Council<br \/>\nthat consolidation is a bad idea and registered voters in Valdosta<br \/>\nshould vote No to school consolidation Tuesday November 8<small><sup>th<\/sup><\/small>.<\/p>\n<p>\nI also like<br \/>\n<a href=\"\/blog\/2011\/11\/how-about-as-a-first-step-the-chamber-pledge-jim-parker.html\"><br \/>\nJim Parker&#8217;s idea:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nHow about as a first step the Chamber pledge an equivalent amount of<br \/>\nmoney it and its members have spent on CUEE to the Boards of Education<br \/>\nyearly, to be used as the teachers see fit?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>They could spend it on incentives for teachers to address all<br \/>\ndistributions of students.<\/p>\n<p>\n-jsq<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It turns out tracking students can help all students if done properly. CUEE&#8217;s invited speaker Terry Jenkins co-authored a paper back in 1997 about Detracking Troup County: Providing an Exemplary Curriculum for All Students. He appeared to be saying de-tracking was an advantge of school consolidation. Back then tracking was apparently considered a bad thing. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[97,40,1376,14,15,49,3305,3452,289,332],"tags":[3480,1636,8829,3483,8705,3477,1945,8869,8701,7,3482,3481,3478,2877,1837,3479,3476,1635,6],"class_list":["post-1309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-activism","category-community","category-cuee","category-economy","category-education","category-elections","category-fvcs","category-nimrod","category-science","category-vlcoc","tag-and-the-impact-of-tracking","tag-consolidation","tag-cuee","tag-doi10-1257aer-101-5-1739","tag-education","tag-endline-score-by-initial-attainment","tag-esther-duflo","tag-fvcs","tag-georgia","tag-lowndes-county","tag-michael-kremer-american-economic-review","tag-pascaline-dupas","tag-peer-effects","tag-school","tag-students","tag-teacher-incentives","tag-tracking","tag-unification","tag-valdosta"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1309"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1309\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}