{"id":11370,"date":"2014-11-14T05:29:19","date_gmt":"2014-11-14T10:29:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/?p=11370"},"modified":"2014-11-14T05:51:00","modified_gmt":"2014-11-14T10:51:00","slug":"china-u-s-and-russia-energy-deals-bad-news-for-sabal-trail-fracked-methane-pipeline","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2014\/11\/china-u-s-and-russia-energy-deals-bad-news-for-sabal-trail-fracked-methane-pipeline.html","title":{"rendered":"China, U.S., and Russia energy deals: bad news for Sabal Trail fracked methane pipeline?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\r\n\r\nThe U.S. and China made a historic deal on climate change this week.\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2014\/11\/12\/world\/us-china-climate-change-agreement\/index.html\">\r\n<img decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:right;border:none\" src=\"http:\/\/i2.cdn.turner.com\/cnn\/dam\/assets\/141112003852-lok-mckenzie-china-apec-climate-change-00010004-story-body.jpg\"><\/a>\r\nHere&#8217;s the good (it&#8217;s real, it&#8217;s huge, and it&#8217;s positive economically\r\nfor both countries), the bad (nuclear is first on the list of those &#8220;clean energy&#8221; sources), and the ugly.\r\nAlso this week China made a second huge natural gas deal with Russia:\r\nwhat does that mean to the current U.S. push for LNG exports,\r\nincluding the proposed Sabal Trail pipeline gouge through Georgia?\r\n<H3>The Deal<\/H3>\r\n<p>\r\nRebecca Leber, The New Republic, 12 November 2014,\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.newrepublic.com\/article\/120242\/us-and-china-reach-agreement-climate-change\">\r\nThe World Has Waited for the U.S. and China to Take Action on Climate Change. They Just Did.<\/a>\r\n<blockquote style=\"font-size:100%\">\r\n<p>\r\nPresident Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping announced on\r\nWednesday commitments to reduce both countries&#8217; greenhouse gas\r\nemissions. The surprise announcement, which came while Obama visits\r\nBeijing this week, is the clearest sign yet the two countries are\r\nserious on climate change.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nAfter months of negotiations<!--more--> with China, Obama has pledged the U.S.\r\nto cut emissions between 26 and 28 percent below 2005 levels by\r\n2025. This is double the pace of carbon cuts the U.S had already\r\npledged to reach by 2020.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nBut China&#8217;s commitments might be even more unexpected, because it is\r\nthe first time the growing economy has committed to a year for\r\ncapping its emissions&mdash;seen as a crucial step for avoiding the\r\nworst-case scenarios of global warming. Xi pledged this will happen\r\naround 2030, though it will try to reach this peak as early as\r\npossible. China also agreed to increase the share of energy that\r\ndoesn&#8217;t come from fossil fuels to 20 percent by 2030.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nTogether, the U.S. and China are responsible for 45 percent of\r\nglobal emissions. For that reason alone, they are the most closely\r\nwatched countries in the year before climate change negotiators\r\nconvene in Paris to set post-2020 goals that finally slow carbon\r\npollution.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nNot that unexpected if you&#8217;ve been paying attention, as\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.perilocity.com\/2011\/12\/air-reputation-in-beijing.html\">\r\nChina has to because of its beyond-hazardous air pollution<\/a>:\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2013\/05\/china-carbon-cap-and-georgia-power.html\">\r\n<img decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:right;border:none;width:300px\" src=\"http:\/\/observers.france24.com\/files\/imagecache\/observers_full_width\/rfi_multimedia_element_image\/smog%20airplane.jpg\"><\/a>\r\n2013-01-14: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2013\/03\/china-regains-lead-in-solar-and-wind-investment-financial-times.html\">\r\nChina regains lead in solar and wind investment \u2014Financial Times<\/a>\r\n<li>\r\n2013-02-19: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2013\/02\/carbon-tax-soon-in-china.html\">\r\nCarbon tax soon in China<\/a> (according to senior official at Ministry of Finance)\r\n<li>\r\n\r\n2014-05:\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2013\/05\/china-carbon-cap-and-georgia-power.html\">\r\nChina carbon cap and Georgia Power<\/a>\r\n<li>\r\n2013-07-30:\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2013\/10\/china-375-billion-conservation-and-pollution-investment.html\">China $375 billion conservation and pollution investment<\/a>\r\n<li>\r\n2014-02: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2014\/10\/china-can-go-80-sun-wind-water-power-by-2050-wwf.html\">\r\nChina can go 80% sun, wind, water power by 2050 &mdash;WWF<\/a>\r\n<\/ul>\r\nAbout that last I wrote:\r\n&#8220;So this path will not only improve Chinese quality of life by getting rid of massive pollution by reducing emissions 90% from otherwise-projected levels; it will also give Chinese citizens more money in their pockets.&#8221;\r\n\r\n<H3>The Good<\/H3>\r\n<p>Here&#8217;s somebody else that gets it that clean energy is the path to prosperity.\r\nSierra Club Executive Director Michael Brune, 12 November 2014,\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/sierraclub.typepad.com\/michaelbrune\/\">\r\nRacing to the Top with China<\/a>,\r\n<blockquote style=\"font-size:100%\">\r\n<p>\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/sierraclub.typepad.com\/michaelbrune\/\">\r\n<img decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:right;border:none\" src=\"http:\/\/vault.sierraclub.org\/email\/images\/brune3.jpg\"><\/a>\r\nSuch rapid clean-energy growth will accelerate a positive feedback\r\nloop. As China drives toward its goal, clean energy prices will\r\ncontinue to drop. Solar and wind are cheaper than fossil fuels in\r\nmany places already; as prices plummet even further, the transition\r\nfrom dirty fuels will pick up speed, helping China, the U.S., and\r\nother countries meet and exceed their climate targets and save money\r\nin the process.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nThe U.S. and China aren&#8217;t acting out of sheer altruism, though\r\n&mdash; both countries will also gain tremendously by leading the\r\ntransition to a clean-energy economy. Sure, cutting carbon pollution\r\nis a driving factor, but there&#8217;s enormous benefit in doing so.\r\nFighting climate change is something that we get to do, not just\r\nsomething that we have to do. According to the Center for American\r\nProgress, an accelerated transition to clean energy in this country\r\nwill create 2.7 million new jobs in the clean energy sector\r\nnationwide. No doubt the Chinese have performed a similar calculus.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nWhite House PR, 11 November 2014,\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/m.whitehouse.gov\/the-press-office\/2014\/11\/11\/fact-sheet-us-china-joint-announcement-climate-change-and-clean-energy-c\">\r\nFACT SHEET: U.S.-China Joint Announcement on Climate Change and Clean Energy Cooperation:\r\nPresident Obama Announces Ambitious 2025 Target to Cut U.S. Climate Pollution by 26-28 Percent from 2005 Levels<\/a>,\r\nincludes more about efficiency and &#8220;Economy-wide Measures to reduce other Greenhouse Gases&#8221; including methane.\r\n<H3>The Bad<\/H3>\r\n<p>\r\nThat same White House PR (emphasis mine):\r\n<blockquote style=\"font-size:100%\">\r\n<p>\r\nChina&#8217;s target to expand total energy consumption coming from\r\nzero-emission sources to around 20 percent by 2030 is notable. It\r\nwill require China to deploy an additional 800-1,000 gigawatts of\r\n<strong>\r\nnuclear, wind, solar and other zero emission generation capacity<\/strong> by\r\n2030 &mdash; more than all the coal-fired power plants that exist in\r\nChina today and close to total current electricity generation\r\ncapacity in the United States.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nThe buried list\r\nis in exactly the wrong order, with nuclear first.\r\nNuclear plants (including Plant Hatch, about 100 miles from where I type)\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2013\/03\/even-the-smallest-amount-of-tritium-can-have-negative-health-impacts-and-most-nukes-leak-tritium.html\">\r\nleak radioactive tritium<\/a>\r\nand <a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2012\/07\/nuclear-and-coal-burning-water-solar-doesnt.html\">use massive amounts of water for cooling<\/a>,\r\njust like coal or gas plants.\r\n<p>\r\nThe order should be solar, wind, and other, including conservation and efficiency.\r\n<p>\r\nBut hey, it&#8217;s a start, and it&#8217;s a big step beyond everything\r\nbefore this week.\r\n<p>\r\nAnd at least no emissions does exclude natural gas.\r\n<H3>The Ugly<\/H3>\r\n<p>\r\nBut fracked methane and China are in the news this same week,\r\nfollowing a previous deal.\r\nRichard Martin, Forbes, 30 May 2014,\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/pikeresearch\/2014\/05\/30\/russia-china-gas-deal-narrows-window-for-u-s-exports\/\">\r\nRussia-China Gas Deal Narrows Window for U.S. Exports<\/a>,\r\n<blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nRussia and China&#8217;s grand bargain on energy, a 30-year, $400 billion\r\ndeal to pipe natural gas from Russia&#8217;s Far East to China, has\r\nprompted much commentary on the agreement&#8217;s potential to reshape\r\nglobal energy markets and tilt the balance of influence in Ukraine\r\nand, more broadly, in Europe. The deal has &ldquo;upped the ante for\r\nEuropeans to diversify their gas imports away from Russia,&rdquo;\r\nsaid Erica Downs of the Brookings Institution; it means producers of\r\nliquefied natural gas (LNG) &ldquo;may face more competitive markets\r\nin Japan and South Korea, which together bought more than half of\r\nthe world&#8217;s supply in 2013,&rdquo; wrote Chou Hui Hong, a\r\nSingapore-based reporter for Bloomberg News; &ldquo;the implications\r\nare potentially huge for Russia, for China and much of Asia, and\r\nalso for Europe,&rdquo; declared Keith Johnson, covering all the\r\nbases in Foreign Policy.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nAll the bases, that is, except one: the United States. The shale gas\r\nrevolution in the States has led natural gas producers to envision\r\nan export boom in which U.S. companies become key suppliers to East\r\nAsia while countering Russian influence by shipping large amounts of\r\nLNG to Europe. President Obama said in 2012 that the U.S. is\r\nbecoming &ldquo;the Saudia Arabia of natural gas.&rdquo;\r\n<\/p>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nOK, that&#8217;s also part of the bad news: the same U.S. president who\r\njust made the historic climate change deal with China\r\nis pushing LNG exports.\r\n<p>\r\nBut the Forbes article followed up its title article with maybe some good news:\r\n<blockquote style=\"font-size:100%\">\r\n<H4>Better Hurry<\/H4>\r\n<p>\r\nIndeed, U.S. petroleum exports reached 3.5 million barrels a day in\r\n2013, roughly double the level of 5 years ago, according to the\r\nEnergy Information Administration. Proponents of increased LNG\r\nexports argue that the gas export boom will bring in billions in\r\nprofits for American companies, create thousands of high-paying\r\njobs, and reduce the influence of undesirable LNG suppliers, i.e.,\r\nVladimir Putin&#8217;s Russia.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nAll of that is, potentially, true. But there are signals that, even\r\nbefore the Russo-Chinese gas deal, natural gas advocates were\r\noverstating the potential market. And with China building pipelines\r\nto ship LNG across Central Asia, the market opportunity is dwindling\r\nfast.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nThe United States has been slow off the mark in building export\r\ncapacity. Thirty-one applications for LNG export licenses have been\r\napproved since 2011; only seven have been approved, six\r\nconditionally.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nThe article says that even with\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/spectrabusters.org\/2014\/09\/30\/ferc-authorized-cove-point-lng-export-in-maryland\/\">authorization of Cove Point LNG exports from Maryland<\/a>,\r\nabout the projected shipping date of early 2017:\r\n<blockquote style=\"font-size:100%\">\r\nThat could be too late.\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nThe apparently hugely higher methane prices in overseas markets\r\naren&#8217;t really that much higher if fracking pushers have to liquefy\r\nthe gas and send it by slow ships.\r\nAnd the low price China is paying for Russian gas\r\n&#8220;is putting downward pressure on higher prices for Japan and South Korea&#8221;.\r\n<p>\r\nPrices just got uglier for the fracking pushers:\r\nNick Cunningham, Christiam Science Monitory, 12 November 2014,\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.csmonitor.com\/Environment\/Energy-Voices\/2014\/1112\/Russia-in-weak-position-for-new-gas-deal-with-China\">\r\nRussia in weak position for new gas deal with China:\r\nThe new natural gas deal between China and Russia is lopsided in China&#8217;s favor. Western sanctions, plunging oil prices, and a plummeting currency all put Russia at a bargaining disadvantage vis-\u00e0-vis China.<\/a>\r\n<blockquote style=\"font-size:100%\">\r\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.csmonitor.com\/Environment\/Energy-Voices\/2014\/1112\/Russia-in-weak-position-for-new-gas-deal-with-China\">\r\n<img decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:right;border:none;width:300px\" src=\"http:\/\/www.csmonitor.com\/var\/ezflow_site\/storage\/images\/media\/content\/2014\/11.12-russia-china-gas-deal\/19265409-1-eng-US\/11.12-russia-china-gas-deal_standard_600x400.jpg\"><\/a>\r\nIn a continued shift towards the east, Russia has inked a second\r\nmajor natural gas deal with China.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nThe latest deal, worth a bit less than the landmark $400 billion\r\nnatural gas deal in May 2014, could see major volumes of natural gas\r\nflowing into western China. Exact terms have yet to be agreed upon.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\nWhat is unique about this deal is that the natural gas will actually\r\ncome from fields that also service European customers. The move\r\nwould provide Russia with enhanced flexibility, giving state-owned\r\nnatural gas company Gazprom the ability to shift natural gas exports\r\nfrom Europe to China if it sees the need to do so.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nAnd there&#8217;s the even uglier question:\r\ndo China&#8217;s gas deals with Russia open the European market to\r\nfracking pushers via U.S. LNG export?\r\nOr do they push down the price of methane enough to make\r\nLNG export no longer profitable?\r\n<p>\r\nThe CSM story says about the previous deal in May:\r\n<blockquote style=\"font-size:100%\">\r\n<p>\r\nThe breakthrough in negotiations came as a result of the standoff\r\nbetween Russia and Europe over Ukraine, which made Russian President\r\nVladimir Putin more anxious to cut a deal with China. As a result,\r\nChina prevailed over Russia on its pricing demands. That agreement\r\ncould see 38 billion cubic meters of Russian gas exported to China\r\nbeginning in 2018. It would involve the development of natural gas\r\nfields in Siberia, plus the construction of new pipelines connecting\r\ninto China at multiple points in the east.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nMore production in Siberia could let Russia supply <em>both<\/em>\r\nEurope and China.\r\nWhich would push gas prices down even more.\r\nPlus:\r\n<blockquote style=\"font-size:100%\">\r\n<p>\r\nThe latest deal will likely be even more lopsided in China&#8217;s favor.\r\nThat is because Russia&#8217;s leverage has been severely diminished in\r\njust the few months since the May 2014 deal. Western sanctions have\r\nstruck a severe blow to the Russian economy. A 30 percent decline in\r\noil prices is likely blowing a huge hole in the Russian budget,\r\nwhich depends on oil and gas exports for 52 percent of its budget\r\nrevenues.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nU.S. LNG exports will have a hard time competing with\r\nbargain-basement Russian pipelines.\r\n<H3>Sad News for Sabal Trail?<\/H3>\r\n<p>\r\nSo it&#8217;s no wonder that Sabal Trail will probably file for\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/spectrabusters.org\/2014\/08\/12\/timeline-sabal-trail\/\">\r\nthe FERC formal permitting process<\/a>\r\nvery soon after\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/spectrabusters.org\/2014\/11\/06\/ecomment-to-ferc-by-nov-15th\/\">\r\nthe latest 15 November 2014 (tomorrow) FERC comment deadline<\/a>.\r\nEven if Spectra and FPL get their FERC permit for Sabal Trail on\r\nthe timeline they want, they don&#8217;t plan to have any methane flowing\r\nuntil <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sabaltrailtransmission.com\/faq\">1 May 2017<\/a>.\r\nAnd, as Forbes said about Cove Point LNG:\r\n<blockquote style=\"font-size:100%\">\r\nThat could be too late.\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nThis has to be at least one reason why\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/spectrabusters.org\/2014\/11\/06\/ferc-nervous-about-being-watched\/\">FERC is nervous about being watched<\/a>.\r\nAnd\r\nSabal Trail has to be very nervous about\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/spectrabusters.org\/2014\/11\/05\/ferc-lost-half-of-dougherty-county-sabal-trail-resolution\/\">\r\nDougherty County<\/a>\r\nand\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/spectrabusters.org\/2014\/11\/13\/agriculture-over-pipeline-terrell-county-resolution-against-sabal-trail\/\">Terrell County<\/a>, Georgia\r\npassing resolutions against Sabal Trail.\r\n<p>\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/spectrabusters.org\/2014\/11\/05\/ferc-lost-half-of-dougherty-county-sabal-trail-resolution\/\">\r\n<img decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:right;border:none\" src=\"http:\/\/spectrabusters.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/11\/alternatives-037-231x300.jpg\"><\/a>\r\nWhat if more counties ask, like Dougherty County did, for this:\r\n<blockquote style=\"font-size:100%\">\r\n<p>\r\nSECTION III We ask that serious consideration and analysis be given\r\nto the alternative route through the Panhandle of Florida, a copy of\r\nwhich is attached hereto.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<\/blockquote>\r\n<p>\r\nThat would cost Sabal Trail a bundle to go bully landowners for survey\r\nand easements in a whole bunch of new counties.\r\nWhich could bust even their May 2017 start shipping date.\r\nWhich would stick a pin in\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/spectrabusters.org\/2014\/10\/18\/transco-plans-ferc-filing-in-the-next-month-or-so\/\">\r\nWilliams Company&#8217;s Atlantic Sunrise project<\/a>\r\nto pipe Marcellus Shale gas through Transco to Sabal Trail.\r\nAnd could crimp <a href=\"http:\/\/spectrabusters.org\/2014\/11\/06\/spectra-buys-into-penneast-pipeline-for-marcellus-shale-fracked-gas-to-transco\/\">Spectra&#8217;s\r\nPennEast pipeline co-venture<\/a>.\r\nIt could pop\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2013\/01\/carbon-bubble-solar-and-wind-erode-coal-gas-and-biomass-credit-quality-moodys.html\">\r\nthe carbon bubble<\/a>.\r\n<p>\r\nOpposition in Hamilton County, Florida and elsewhere\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/spectrabusters.org\/2014\/10\/16\/sabal-trail-delays-formal-ferc-filing-until-sometime-later-this-year\/\">has already busted Sabal Trail&#8217;s 31 October 2014 formal filing date<\/a>.\r\n<p>\r\nThe news for Sabal Trail is unrelentingly bad,\r\nand getting worse, including for example\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.wwals.net\/2014\/10\/22\/gwc-dd9-sabal-trail-pipeline-threatens-withlacoochee-river-floridan-aquifer\/\">Sabal Trail making the Georgia Water Coalition Dirty Dozen 2014<\/a>.\r\n<p>\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2014\/09\/alternative-4-richland-preston-americus-cordele-ashburn-and-i-75-ferc-to-sabal-trail.html\">\r\n<img decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:right;border:none\" src=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/89ad70736e0b6bd6db74ca0f7cbde9cb.jpg\"><\/a>\r\nAll but two proposed routes would go through Lowndes County, Georgia,\r\nand three of them would go right past Lowndes High School.\r\nSo far the Lowndes County Chairman wrote a letter to FERC\r\nsaying existing permits must be followed but then did nothing\r\nas Sabal Trail drilled test wells next to the Withlacoochee River.\r\nBut there&#8217;s already one new Commissioner, and two more start in January,\r\nboth of whom are not exactly fans of that pipeline.\r\nWhat if Lowndes County listened to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2014\/11\/why-should-we-let-this-foreign-corporation-sabal-trail-run-roughshod-over-us-jim-parker-lcc-2014-11-11.html\">what its citizens told it yet again Tuesday<\/a>\r\nand passed a resolution against the pipeline?\r\nWhat if the Valdosta City Council emulated Albany, Georgia and passed a resolution?\r\nWhat about the Lowndes County Board of Education?\r\n<p>\r\nWhat if Sabal Trail lost Georgia?\r\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2014\/09\/suwannee-county-chairman-denied-his-sabal-trail-coments-after-fpl-talked-to-him.html\">\r\n<img decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:right;border:none\" src=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/225f547585557d47e217b80a37784e3a.jpg\"><\/a>\r\n<em>Every<\/em> proposed route of that pipeline, including Dougherty County&#8217;s\r\nproposed bypass-Georgia route,\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.wwals.net\/2014\/09\/22\/sabal-trail-move-pipeline-withlacoochee-river-florida\/\">\r\nwould go through Suwannee County, Florida<\/a>.\r\nWhich could could explain why Sabal Trail co-conspirator FPL\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2014\/09\/suwannee-county-chairman-denied-his-sabal-trail-coments-after-fpl-talked-to-him.html\">\r\ntalked to the Suwannee County Commission Chair who immediately\r\nbacked off on opposing the pipeline<\/a>.\r\nBut that Chair is not going to be on that Commission anymore come January,\r\nand at least one of the newcomers is vociferously opposed to the pipeline.\r\nWhat if Suwannee County passed a resolution against the pipeline?\r\n<p>\r\nWhat if Sabal Trail lost Florida?\r\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2014\/03\/100-sun-wind-and-water-can-power-each-u-s-state-and-the-world-stanford-study.html\">\r\n<img decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:right;border:none;width:300px\" src=\"http:\/\/thesolutionsproject.org\/infographic\/img\/infographics\/solutionsProject-ga.png\"><\/a>\r\nWhat if those or other county commissions or city councils passed\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/spectrabusters.org\/2014\/09\/02\/action-letter-to-county-commissioners-against-sabal-trail-pipeline\/\">\r\nlegally-binding land-use or noise or other ordinances rooted in their\r\nComprehensive Plans<\/a>?\r\nThat has worked against fracking in New York State and against\r\npipelines in Pennsylvania, approved all the way to each of their\r\nstate Supreme Courts.\r\nIf some local government should decide to test an ordinance,\r\nsuch a legal battle could cost Sabal Trail many months.\r\n<p>\r\nMonths Forbes says it doesn&#8217;t have.\r\n<p>\r\n\r\nWhich could make Spectra fold like it did\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/spectrabusters.org\/2014\/09\/01\/warren-county-va-resolution-against-spectra-pipeline\/\">\r\nin Virginia after\r\nseveral counties passed resolutions against a pipeline<\/a>,\r\nor like Williams did when it\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/spectrabusters.org\/2014\/05\/01\/bluegrass-fracked-methane-pipeline-cancelled\/\">\r\n&#8220;suspended&#8221; its Bluegrass Pipeline\r\nin Kentucky<\/a> after massive public opposition and a judge ruled\r\nKentucky eminent domain doesn&#8217;t apply.\r\n<p>\r\nThat would be so sad, don&#8217;t you think?\r\n<p>\r\nFor profiteering fossil fuel companies and regressive utilities.\r\n<p>\r\nThe rest of us already know\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2014\/03\/100-sun-wind-and-water-can-power-each-u-s-state-and-the-world-stanford-study.html\">\r\nwe can power the whole world on sun, wind, and water<\/a>,\r\nand we can get on with it without wasting any more time or resources\r\non fracked methane pipeline boondoggles.\r\nThere are already\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/2013\/11\/more-solar-jobs-already-than-coal-or-oil-and-gas-extraction.html\">\r\nmore solar jobs than in non-managerial oil and gas extraction<\/a>.\r\n<p>\r\nLet&#8217;s follow the sun to clean air, clean water, and clean jobs.\r\n<p>\r\n -jsq\r\n<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The U.S. and China made a historic deal on climate change this week. Here&#8217;s the good (it&#8217;s real, it&#8217;s huge, and it&#8217;s positive economically for both countries), the bad (nuclear is first on the list of those &#8220;clean energy&#8221; sources), and the ugly. Also this week China made a second huge natural gas deal with [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[556,47,141,216,14,203,8,1105,6124,104,6687,24,55,36,126],"tags":[8779,398,8719,8745,8753,974,206,8704,4615,8751,1763,8701,973,847,8702,5520,2475,12,7,8027,562,8737,812,6076,1129,5702,6597,8028,34,8714,6966,223,1958,6,8727,8716,8740],"class_list":["post-11370","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-air","category-climate-change","category-co2","category-coal","category-economy","category-florida","category-georgia","category-lcboe","category-natural-gas-2","category-nuclear","category-pipeline-2","category-solar","category-water","category-wind","category-wwals","tag-air","tag-china","tag-climate-change","tag-co2","tag-coal","tag-dirty-dozen","tag-dougherty-county","tag-economy","tag-eminent-domain","tag-florida","tag-fpl","tag-georgia","tag-georgia-water-coalition","tag-jobs","tag-lake","tag-land-use","tag-lawsuit","tag-lowndes-area-knowledge-exchange","tag-lowndes-county","tag-michael-brune","tag-natural-gas","tag-nuclear","tag-ordinance","tag-pipeline","tag-resolution","tag-russia","tag-sabal-trail-transmission","tag-siberia","tag-sierra-club","tag-solar","tag-spectra-energy","tag-suwannee-county","tag-terrell-county","tag-valdosta","tag-water","tag-wind","tag-wwals"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p585fK-2Xo","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11370","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11370"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11370\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11388,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11370\/revisions\/11388"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11370"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11370"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.l-a-k-e.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11370"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}